Generally back porting like this unless its a major security thing is not done to stable.
differences to the 6.0-stable from current --with-ntvfs-fileserver \ --without-gpgme LDB_V = 1.1.27 TEVENT_V = 0.9.29 vs LDB_V = 1.1.26 TEVENT_V = 0.9.28 The trivial DB and the Tevent libs are also slightly different versions. https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.4.6.html * BUG 12028: vfs_acl_xattr: Objects without NT ACL xattr. * BUG 12105: async_req: Make async_connect_send() "reentrant". * BUG 12177: vfs_acl_common: Fix unexpected synthesized default ACL from vfs_acl_xattr. * BUG 12181: vfs_acl_xattr|tdb: Enforced settings when "ignore system acls = yes". * BUG 11991: build: Build less of Samba when building '--without-ntvfs-fileserver'. Make me wonder if there is more breakage in samba itself. Hmm wonder if updating stable to 4.4.9 would help? Ian McWilliam ________________________________________ From: owner-po...@openbsd.org [owner-po...@openbsd.org] on behalf of alexmcwhir...@triadic.us [alexmcwhir...@triadic.us] Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017 3:56 PM To: Vijay Sankar Cc: ports@openbsd.org; owner-po...@openbsd.org Subject: Re: samba4 and ACL's Here are my testing results. OpenBSD 5.9 - BASE (Samba 4.1): Works as expected with ntvfs OpenBSD 5.9 - STABLE (Samba 4.3): Works as expected with ntvfs OpenBSD 6.0 - BASE (Samba 4.4): Had to modify makefile to include ntvfs support. smb service (aka ntvfs) fails to start OpenBSD 6.0 - STABLE (Samba 4.4): Had to modify makefile to include ntvfs support. smb service (aka ntvfs) fails to start OpenBSD CURRENT (Samba 4.5): ntvfs support already in makefile, works as expected. Is it reasonable to expect samba 4.5 to be backported to 6.0 stable in the near future?