On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 02:41:26PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > With this PERMIT_* I'm not sure if it's really worth bothering with. > > > Index: Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/agrep/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.24 > diff -u -p -r1.24 Makefile > --- Makefile 17 Mar 2016 21:14:46 -0000 1.24 > +++ Makefile 11 Apr 2017 13:39:54 -0000 > @@ -13,10 +13,15 @@ EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.Z > PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP= may not modify > PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= no fee > PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= Yes > + > WANTLIB= c > > -MAKE_FLAGS= CC="${CC}" CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" > +.include <bsd.port.arch.mk> > +.if ${PROPERTIES:Mclang} > +CFLAGS+= -Wno-return-type --std=gnu89 > +.endif > > +MAKE_FLAGS= CC="${CC}" CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" > ALL_TARGET= > > NO_TEST= Yes
I'm pretty sure the licence is an oversight. Anyone tried contacting the authors yet ?...