As espie@ told me in private, the toolchain issue probably should be resolved instead of using this hack. I personally don't use elvis, so I don't mind to keep it as is and wait for a proper solution.
On 14:21 Fri 26 May , Stuart Henderson wrote: > ok, but I'm wondering if we should be marking this type of patch somehow? > A full clang toolchain doesn't have a problem with this. it's only needed for > clang with the binutils linker we have in base.
