Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> writes: > On 2017/07/03 15:50, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: >> Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> writes: >> >> > This makes sense to me, any differing opinions? >> >> Makes sense. >> >> libmtp builds fine with clang from base on amd64. If the same can be >> said about misp64el, then maybe >> >> COMPILER=base gcc >> MODGCC4_ARCHS= misp64el >> >> would be nicer in the long run. > > This would just be > > COMPILER= gcc > MODGCC4_ARCHS= mips64el > COMPILER_LANGS= c > > We don't have clang on mips64el anyway,
Oops... > but if we were to ever get it, > that would avoid having to change it later. So I think that would be the > right thing to do. > >> > I would add a comment explaining what it's for, just something like >> > << # avoid "libmtp.so.7.0: undefined reference to `.L2085'" >> >> >> ack > > So in total: ok jca@ [...] -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
