> Am 19.08.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Antoine Jacoutot <ajacou...@bsdfrog.org>: > > Since the README explicitely states gnupg2, I think we should go for this, > even > if gnupg1 is compatible, to prevent surprises in the future. > OK?
Sure. Gpg1 has somewhat lesser dependencies, but lacks default support for the gpg-agent, which significantly increases the usability of pass. Also considering recent periods of subtle incompatibilities between both versions, maybe it is about time to phase out gpg1 anyways.