On Sun, November 12, 2017 22:27, Brian Callahan wrote:
>
> On 11/12/17 14:08, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
>> On Sun, November 12, 2017 20:12, Edd Barrett wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 11:49:20AM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
>>>> devel/luabitop is a BDEP of editors/neovim. devel/lua-bitop is not used by
>>>> anything (at least, as far as `make search key=lua-bitop` suggests).
>>>> devel/luabitop also appears to be the more comprehensive port.
>>>>
>>>> OK to remove devel/lua-bitop?
>>> Ugh. IIRC, I imported lua-bitop for neovim, probably missing luabitop
>>> becuase it wasn't prefixed 'lua-'. Somehow I then managed to depend on
>>> the existing luabitop.
>>>
>>> I've checked using sqlports that there are no other dependents, so your
>>> plan seems sensible to me. OK edd@, but perhaps wait a bit and see if
>>> anyone else chimes in.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>> Hi!
>> lua- prefix is a standard. IMHO you should remove luabitop and add lua-bitop
>> as a dependency to neovim.
>> Just my 2 cents.
>>
>
> Or should luabitop be moved to lua-bitop?
>
I think you need to merge all the tweaks from both ports in lua-bitop and
remove luabitop directory with all quirks and @pkgpath dance.
