On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:14:11PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> This is a security update[0] fixing a data leak:
> 
>       A wrong if statement in the varnishd source code means that
>       synthetic objects in stevedores which over-allocate, may leak up
>       to page size of data from a malloc(3) memory allocation.
> 
>       In a unpredictable percentage of the cases where this condition
>       arises, a segmentation fault will happen instead.
> 
> Tests continue to pass:
> 
>       # TOTAL: 636
>       # PASS:  630
>       # SKIP:  5
>       # XFAIL: 0
>       # FAIL:  1
>       # XPASS: 0
>       # ERROR: 0
> 
>       FAIL tests/u00000.vtc (exit status: 2)
> 
> Removed TEST_TARGET=check as it's default. I also replaced cp with
> ${INSTALL_DATA} post-install and pointed users to 5.2 docs.
> 
> Since Varnish compiles .vsc files to C using python with 2.7 specific
> code (import StringIO), I added lang/python and explicity set
> MODPY_VERSION=2.7.
> 
> Feedback? Does anyone want to commit this?
> 
> 0: https://varnish-cache.org/releases/rel5.2.1.html#rel5-2-1
> 
> diff --git a/www/varnish/Makefile b/www/varnish/Makefile
> index b0fa5029ab4..5cf58670364 100644
> --- a/www/varnish/Makefile
> +++ b/www/varnish/Makefile
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  
>  COMMENT =            high-performance HTTP accelerator
>  
> -DISTNAME =           varnish-5.2.0
> +DISTNAME =           varnish-5.2.1
>  
>  CATEGORIES =         www
>  
> @@ -16,12 +16,16 @@ MAINTAINER =              Jim Razmus II 
> <j...@openbsd.org> \
>  # BSD
>  PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM =       Yes
>  
> -MASTER_SITES =          https://varnish-cache.org/_downloads/
> +MASTER_SITES =          ${HOMEPAGE}_downloads/
>  
>  EXTRACT_SUFX =               .tgz
>  
>  WANTLIB += c execinfo m ncursesw pcre pthread readline termcap
>  
> +MODULES =            lang/python
> +
> +MODPY_VERSION =              2.7
> +
>  BUILD_DEPENDS =              ${MODGNU_AUTOCONF_DEPENDS} \
>                       ${MODGNU_AUTOMAKE_DEPENDS} \
>                       devel/libtool \
> @@ -30,6 +34,8 @@ LIB_DEPENDS =               devel/pcre
>  # The internal backtrace implementation fails to build with -Werror on 
> arm/hppa
>  LIB_DEPENDS +=               devel/libexecinfo
>  
> +MODPY_RUNDEP =               No
> +
>  WRKDIST =            ${WRKDIR}/${DISTNAME}
>  USE_GMAKE =          Yes
>  CONFIGURE_STYLE =    gnu
> @@ -38,7 +44,7 @@ AUTOMAKE_VERSION =  1.15
>  CONFIGURE_ENV =              CPPFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE}/include" \
>                       LDFLAGS="-L${LOCALBASE}/lib ${LDFLAGS}"
>  
> -TEST_TARGET =                check
> +MODPY_ADJ_FILES =    lib/lib*/*.py
>  
>  post-patch:
>       cd ${WRKSRC} && env AUTOCONF_VERSION=${AUTOCONF_VERSION} \
> @@ -47,7 +53,7 @@ post-patch:
>  post-install:
>       ${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/doc/varnish
>       ${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/examples/varnish
> -     cp ${WRKDIST}${SYSCONFDIR}/{example,builtin}.vcl \
> +     ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIST}${SYSCONFDIR}/{example,builtin}.vcl \
>           ${PREFIX}/share/examples/varnish
>       rm -f ${PREFIX}/lib/varnish/{vmods,}/*.{a,la}
>  
> diff --git a/www/varnish/distinfo b/www/varnish/distinfo
> index f7dc351f783..cdba07a9889 100644
> --- a/www/varnish/distinfo
> +++ b/www/varnish/distinfo
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -SHA256 (varnish-5.2.0.tgz) = zEgmoEgPSSaNOZYwnkt+RlFR6aUjzPjq1JnsV1FJ9H4=
> -SIZE (varnish-5.2.0.tgz) = 2828867
> +SHA256 (varnish-5.2.1.tgz) = uEUsnXjBb3jIz9HBoeaWUjv2S3chwzAVDcwIUkWQFLM=
> +SIZE (varnish-5.2.1.tgz) = 2827676
> diff --git a/www/varnish/pkg/MESSAGE b/www/varnish/pkg/MESSAGE
> index 5f50b1bbf2a..ce02efaef87 100644
> --- a/www/varnish/pkg/MESSAGE
> +++ b/www/varnish/pkg/MESSAGE
> @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ or the following link for more information:
>  
>  and for further information:
>  
> -     https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/5.0/
> +     https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/5.2/
> 
One week bump, neither of the two maintainers have replied so far.

I can take of the python 2.7 bits in another diff so the next
revision/release won't depend on 2.7 anymore.

Reply via email to