On 12/20/2017 2:18 PM, Theo Buehler wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 07:53:31PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 01:18:24PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 08:11:56PM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
This is not some famous piece of software like the GNU coreutils, where
accidentally using the base utility vs. the GNU utility could really matter.
Fair enough, I'm happy with a simpler port.
They bleed into each other.
When I load vis by itself, I get:
0% 1, 1
When I press i to enter insert mode, it becomes:
0% 1, 1 1
Then if I type, say, "OpenBSD" it shows:
100% 1, 1 71
Let's say I finish the sentence and now I wrote "OpenBSD is an operating
system." it will display:
100% 1, 10311
Now let's say I press Enter to move to the next line, it says:
97% 2, 0311
I would say this is very broken. This is within tmux, which limited testing
suggests makes a difference, but there are still bleeding issues when not in
tmux. Specifically, outside of tmux, pressing i in a blank file still
produces
0% 1, 1 1
I cannot reproduce this at all, whether in tmux or not. vis works fine
for me in both xterm and st.
Brian is still the only I heard of having this issue, can anyone else
reproduce this?
I've been using vis a bit over the past week and the port seems to work
just fine. In particular, I was unable to see the problems bcallah
described.
Besides that, I renamed both binary and manual page to vise again to
avoid conflicts; conflicts should be avoided even if it might be of such
minor concern.
Can anyone else please test this? If no further breakage comes up I'd
really like to see this port go in.
If bcallah no longer objects, I'm ok with importing this version of the
port.
I'm not planning on using this editor, so I do not object.
~Brian
