I'm not sure if it makes sense to create a new port for dnscrypt-proxy 2.0.0. Why not collaborate with the maintainer and update the existing port?
- [new] net/dnscrypt-proxy2: flexible dns proxy with suppor... Vinícius Zavam
- Re: [new] net/dnscrypt-proxy2: flexible dns proxy wi... Björn Ketelaars
- Re: [new] net/dnscrypt-proxy2: flexible dns proxy wi... Stuart Henderson
- Re: [new] net/dnscrypt-proxy2: flexible dns prox... Vinícius Zavam
- Re: [new] net/dnscrypt-proxy2: flexible dns ... Stuart Henderson
- Re: [new] net/dnscrypt-proxy2: flexible ... Stuart Henderson
- Re: [new] net/dnscrypt-proxy2: flex... Vinícius Zavam
- Re: [new] net/dnscrypt-proxy2: flexible dns ... Vinícius Zavam
- Re: [new] net/dnscrypt-proxy2: flexible ... Stuart Henderson