On 2018/03/09 01:59, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:23:52AM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > Index: Makefile
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/sogo/Makefile,v
> > retrieving revision 1.74
> > diff -u -r1.74 Makefile
> > --- Makefile        11 Jan 2018 19:27:12 -0000      1.74
> > +++ Makefile        8 Mar 2018 09:46:46 -0000
> > @@ -2,15 +2,15 @@
> >  
> >  COMMENT =  web based groupware server
> >  
> > -VERSION =  3.2.10
> > +VERSION =  4.0.0
> >  DISTNAME = SOGo-${VERSION}
> >  PKGNAME =  sogo-${VERSION}
> >  REVISION = 1
> Zap REVISION.
> 
> >  SHARED_LIBS +=     GDLContentStore 3.0
> > -SHARED_LIBS +=     NGCards         3.0
> > -SHARED_LIBS +=     SOGo            4.1
> > -SHARED_LIBS +=     SOGoUI          2.1
> > +SHARED_LIBS +=     NGCards         3.1
> > +SHARED_LIBS +=     SOGo            5.0
> > +SHARED_LIBS +=     SOGoUI          2.2
> >  
> >  CATEGORIES =       www
> >  HOMEPAGE = http://www.sogo.nu/
> https://sogo.nu works.
> 
> > @@ -72,8 +72,14 @@
> >             ${WRKSRC}/Scripts/sql-update-2.2.17_to_2.3.0.sh \
> >             ${PREFIX}/share/doc/sogo/sql-update-2.2.17_to_2.3.0-postgres.sh
> >     ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} -c -o ${SHAREOWN} -g ${SHAREGRP} \
> > +           ${WRKSRC}/Scripts/sql-update-3.2.10_to_4.0.0.sh \
> > +           ${PREFIX}/share/doc/sogo/sql-update-3.2.10_to_4.0.0-postgres.sh
> > +   ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} -c -o ${SHAREOWN} -g ${SHAREGRP} \
> >             ${WRKSRC}/Scripts/sql-update-2.2.17_to_2.3.0-mysql.sh \
> >             ${PREFIX}/share/doc/sogo/sql-update-2.2.17_to_2.3.0-mysql.sh
> > +   ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} -c -o ${SHAREOWN} -g ${SHAREGRP} \
> > +           ${WRKSRC}/Scripts/sql-update-3.2.10_to_4.0.0-mysql.sh \
> > +           ${PREFIX}/share/doc/sogo/sql-update-3.2.10_to_4.0.0-mysql.sh
> >     ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} -c -o ${SHAREOWN} -g ${SHAREGRP} \
> >             ${WRKSRC}/Scripts/sql-update-3.0.0-to-combined.sh \
> >             ${PREFIX}/share/doc/sogo/sql-update-3.0.0-to-combined.sh
> I'd really simplify these into a loop to shorten the target and ease
> reading:
> 
> .for _s in ...
>       ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ... \
>               ${WRKSRC}/Scripts/..${_s}.. \
>               ${PREFIX}/share/doc/sogo/..${_s}..
> .endfor

Wouldn't it be better to use upstream's standard names? Then a simple
wildcard works, it matches their usual setup, and you don't have the
inconsistency you have here where some files are renamed with
-postgres and others aren't.

> > RCS file: patches/patch-Scripts_sql-update-3_2_10_to_4_0_0-mysql_sh
> > diff -N patches/patch-Scripts_sql-update-3_2_10_to_4_0_0-mysql_sh
> > --- /dev/null       1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> > +++ patches/patch-Scripts_sql-update-3_2_10_to_4_0_0-mysql_sh       8 Mar 
> > 2018 09:46:46 -0000
> > @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> > +$OpenBSD$
> > +
> > +Index: Scripts/sql-update-3.2.10_to_4.0.0-mysql.sh
> > +--- Scripts/sql-update-3.2.10_to_4.0.0-mysql.sh.orig
> > ++++ Scripts/sql-update-3.2.10_to_4.0.0-mysql.sh
> > +@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > +-#!/bin/bash
> > ++#!/bin/sh
> Does the script work with our ksh?

I don't think so.

read -p "Username ($defaultusername): " username
read -p "Hostname ($defaulthostname): " hostname
read -p "Database ($defaultdatabase): " database

bash:

      -p prompt
         Display prompt on standard error, without a trailing newline, before
         attempting to read any input.  The prompt is displayed only if input
         is coming from a terminal.

ksh:

           The -un and -p options cause input to be read from file descriptor n
           (n defaults to 0 if omitted) or the current co-process (see Co-
           processes above for comments on this), respectively.  If the -s
           option is used, input is saved to the history file.

> >  # su _sogo "${TRUEPREFIX}/bin/bash 
> > ${TRUEPREFIX}/share/doc/sogo/sql-update-3.0.0-to-combined.sh"
> >  # su _sogo "${TRUEPREFIX}/bin/bash 
> > ${TRUEPREFIX}/share/doc/sogo/sql-update-3.0.0-to-combined-mysql.sh"
> bash is already missing from RUN_DEPENDS, I wonder if users tried to run
> that instruction but failed.

I would have a good look at the sed invocations in that file and make sure
they don't rely on anything from GNU sed.

Reply via email to