Good idea but 8.6 will still be picked up
in a ports tree where Tcl/Tk default versions are 8.6
and the port Makefile contains MODTK_VERSION=8.5 if MODULES=lang/tcl x11/tk.
(x11/tk lang/tcl) would work).
A remedy would be to swap them around or set MODTCL_VERSION as well.
Only two ports with this problem; I doubt we'll see (or think about it) it much.
For the reasons above and prevention being better than cure, I propose
something like:
Index: tk.port.mk
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/tk/tk.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.13 tk.port.mk
--- tk.port.mk 22 Jul 2018 01:49:25 -0000 1.13
+++ tk.port.mk 25 Jul 2018 00:56:28 -0000
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
# $OpenBSD: tk.port.mk,v 1.13 2018/07/22 01:49:25 stu Exp $
+.if ${MODULES:Mlang/tcl}
+ERRORS += "Fatal: MODULES = lang/tcl or x11/tk but not both.\nChoose one and
set MOD* variables accordingly."
+.endif
+
CATEGORIES += x11/tk
MODTK_VERSION ?= 8.5
Stu
> ---------- Original Message ----------
> From: Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>
> Date: July 24, 2018 at 5:52 PM
>
>
> On 2018/07/24 12:32, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> > Only one is needed. Having both can cause problems.
> >
> > I found 2 ports (lang/pypy, systutils/libisoburn) with this problem, which
> > can be seen:
> > $ cd /usr/ports/sysutils/libisoburn/ && make show=MODULES
> > lang/tcl x11/tk gnu lang/tcl
> >
> > If MODULES=x11/tk then lang/tcl will be automatically added at the end.
> >
> > A port with "MODULES = lang/tcl x11/tk" and "MODTK_VERSION=8.5"
> > will break if the default ports Tcl/Tk is 8.6
> >
> > Using "MODULES=x11/tk" and "MODTK_VERSION=8.5" would be sufficient.
> >
> > OK?
> >
> > Stu
> >
> >
> > Index: Makefile
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/pypy/Makefile,v
> > retrieving revision 1.30
> > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.30 Makefile
> > --- Makefile 15 Dec 2017 16:47:34 -0000 1.30
> > +++ Makefile 24 Jul 2018 16:19:50 -0000
> > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ DISTFILES += ${BOOTSTRAP-${MACHINE_ARCH
> > # if adding archs, list *all* bootstraps in SUPDISTFILES
> > SUPDISTFILES = ${BOOTSTRAP-amd64}:0
> >
> > -MODULES += lang/python lang/tcl x11/tk
> > +MODULES += lang/python x11/tk
> > MODPY_VERSION = 2.7
> >
> > COMPILER = base-clang ports-gcc
> >
> >
> > Index: Makefile
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/ports/sysutils/libisoburn/Makefile,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
> > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.1.1.1 Makefile
> > --- Makefile 19 Dec 2017 20:20:44 -0000 1.1.1.1
> > +++ Makefile 24 Jul 2018 16:20:35 -0000
> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ MASTER_SITES = http://files.libburnia-pr
> > # GPLv2+
> > PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM = Yes
> >
> > -MODULES = lang/tcl x11/tk
> > +MODULES = x11/tk
> >
> > LIB_DEPENDS-main = sysutils/libisofs \
> > sysutils/libburn
> >
>
> Makes sense, but how about making tk.port.mk more robust against this
> as well?
>
> Index: tk.port.mk
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/tk/tk.port.mk,v
> retrieving revision 1.12
> diff -u -p -r1.12 tk.port.mk
> --- tk.port.mk 2 Feb 2013 11:18:28 -0000 1.12
> +++ tk.port.mk 24 Jul 2018 21:52:32 -0000
> @@ -24,7 +24,9 @@ MODTK_CONFIG ?= ${MODTK_LIBDIR}/tkConfi
>
> SUBST_VARS += MODTK_VERSION MODTK_BIN
>
> +.if !${MODULES:Mlang/tcl}
> MODULES += lang/tcl
> +.endif
>
> MODTK_BUILD_DEPENDS ?= ${_MODTK_SPEC}:x11/tk/${MODTK_VERSION} \
> ${MODTCL_BUILD_DEPENDS}
>
>
