On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 05:53:43PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Fri Oct 26, 2018 at 05:19:15PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Update Qt to the latest 5.9 TLS. I removed almost all libressl patches > > and the backports patches from upstream. > > > > Can any of the libressl fallas look over it? According to the tickets, > > everything's closed. > > > > I know it's crazy these days. Maybe someone will find a free bulk build > > slot for the diff below. > > > > Rafael Sadowski > > > > Index: Makefile.version > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/qt5/Makefile.version,v > > retrieving revision 1.6 > > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.6 Makefile.version > > --- Makefile.version 5 Jul 2018 09:49:13 -0000 1.6 > > +++ Makefile.version 26 Oct 2018 15:05:44 -0000 > > @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ > > # $OpenBSD: Makefile.version,v 1.6 2018/07/05 09:49:13 rsadowski Exp $ > > # Common source for Qt5 version > > > > -QT5_VERSION = 5.9.6 > > -QT5_DIST_VERSION = 5.9.6 > > +QT5_VERSION = 5.9.7 > > +QT5_DIST_VERSION = 5.9.7 > > QT5_WEBKIT_VERSION = 5.9.0 > > > > # This one is used for building dependencies for examples and > > documentation, > > # which obviously should be in sync with core packages. > > -QT5_NEXT_VERSION = 5.10 > > +QT5_NEXT_VERSION = 5.12 > > > > The deletion of the above was a mistake from me. Compile at configure > time will fail and thus define QT_NO_SSL which is not correct. Spotted > by landry@ Thanks!
All the other failures i had in my bulk were related to this QtSsl thing, so ok to commit that fixed diff. If there are new failures hidden by it, the next bulk will uncover them, but i'm positive there will be none. Landry
