We could force an upgrade to the latest version, like it was done for
emacs22 and emacs23.  I don't know how an init file written for emacs-21
would behave when interpreted by emacs-26; expect some bumps.  On the
other hand, people who want to keep emacs21 can still look in the Attic.

Diff below.  I needed to explicitely list the no_x11 flavor as below in
order to hint pkg_add -u, maybe this should have been done for emacs22
and emacs23 too.

Input welcome,


Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /d/cvs/ports/editors/emacs/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.78
diff -u -p -r1.78 Makefile
--- Makefile    4 Sep 2018 12:46:11 -0000       1.78
+++ Makefile    31 Oct 2018 00:28:03 -0000
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ COMMENT=                GNU editor: extensible, custom
 
 VERSION=               26.1
 DISTNAME=              emacs-${VERSION}
-REVISION=              2
+REVISION=              3
 
 CATEGORIES=            editors
 
Index: pkg/PLIST
===================================================================
RCS file: /d/cvs/ports/editors/emacs/pkg/PLIST,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -p -r1.22 PLIST
--- pkg/PLIST   4 Sep 2018 12:46:11 -0000       1.22
+++ pkg/PLIST   31 Oct 2018 00:28:03 -0000
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
 @comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.22 2018/09/04 12:46:11 espie Exp $
 @option is-branch
+@pkgpath editors/emacs21,-main
+@pkgpath editors/emacs21,no_x11,-main
+@pkgpath editors/emacs21,-el
+@pkgpath editors/emacs21,-leim
 @pkgpath editors/emacs22,-main
 @pkgpath editors/emacs22,-el
 @pkgpath editors/emacs23,-main

-- 
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Reply via email to