theo wrote:
>
>> The ideal future state would be removing W|X from those remaining
>> ports.
>
> That is seriously idealistic.
>
> The upstream software teams must decide to do that.
>
> After that, the "port" has no work to do.
>
> It is generally impossible for a "port" to solve this problem.
> It's like adding pledge, unveil, or privsep to a piece of
> software upstream-maintained by a group who doesn't understand
> the concept or benefit yet...
Would you mind if for a change, mejust shamelessly agrees w/ you this
time? =)
Ideals are good. They are not always workable. That's why they're
ideals.
--zeurkous.
--
Friggin' Machines!
