On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 20:21:37 -0000 (UTC)
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
[...]
> More generally, I assume if an arch supports (1) 64-bit __sync*
> primitives and (2) __atomic* primitives, then it will also have
> 64-bit __atomic*.
>
> > +# Use __atomic* function instead of __sync* ones, allowing to
> > build on +# the following archs.
> > +CONFIGURE_ARGS += -DUSE_NEW_ATOMIC_BUILTINS=On
> > +.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "powerpc" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "hppa"
> > +WANTLIB += atomic
> > +.endif
>
> I like this better.
> But I don't want to start backseat-driving atomic fixes now, after
> ignoring them all throughout the release cycle...
Do you mean we should wait post unlock?
> --
> Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
> na...@mips.inka.de
>
