On 2020/02/02 04:05, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Seems no one cares about this port. Is it OK that I apply for maintainer?
Certainly. It is a bit easier to take patches from someone that feels responsible enough for a port to be listed as maintainer :) > >>>> >>> * Many of the patches just replace "#!/usr/bin/env bash" to > >>>> >>> "#!/bin/sh". Now most of scripts are changed to use > >>>> >>> "#!/usr/bin/env > >>>> >>> sh" which should now be the same thing. Should we just drop those > >>>> >>> patches? It's not quite the same thing because env searches your path. Explicit /bin/sh seems a much better idea to me so I'm happier to keep those. > >>>> >>> * One of the patches changes the system /etc/msmtprc to provide an > >>>> >>> "account default" that listens on localhost:25, which will then use > >>>> >>> smtpd as server by default. I think the intention is to provide a > >>>> >>> working configure that works out of the box. However this may not > >>>> >>> do > >>>> >>> what you want because if one try to configure an account in a user > >>>> >>> configuration and somehow it contains errors (e.g. not properly > >>>> >>> provide a "from" address), msmtp will just send the mail through > >>>> >>> smtpd > >>>> >>> and returns OK which will result in the mail stuck in the system > >>>> >>> mail > >>>> >>> queue forever. So my suggestion is to leave this file untouched so > >>>> >>> that the system /etc/msmtprc will just provide a fake "account > >>>> >>> default" and any mail not handled with a user provided account will > >>>> >>> fail immediately. i.e. remove patch-doc_msmtprc-system_example? I'd be ok with that.
