On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:54:19AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:30:22AM +0100, clematis wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:12:20PM +0100, Caspar Schutijser wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 03:23:03PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 03:43:06PM +0100, Caspar Schutijser wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:31:15AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > > > On 2019/12/28 09:07, Caspar Schutijser wrote:
> ok good, it's just that in mozilla land, build1 is "first release
> candidate", that's all - cf
> of course TB-browser might not use the same convention :)

FYI, here is the reply from Nicolas Vigier (@boklm torproject): 

=== 8< ===
The naming convention is based on the git tag we are using:
  src-firefox-tor-browser-${firefox_version}-${torbrowser_branch}-${n}-build${m}

${n} is a number that we increase if we rebase our patches. Usually we
don't rebase them on the same firefox version, so most of the time it
is '1'.

${m} is a number that we increase when we added new patches. A -build2
for example indicates that we did a first build, then added new patches
and did a second build (however only the last one is uploaded to
dist.tpo).
=== 8< ===

Also note that:
Release Candidates are uploaded under the ~/ of whoever is building it.
There should always be only one firefox source tarball for each Tor
Browser version on dist.tpo.

Caspar, if you are interested in this, Nicolas offered to send an email
out when they have a Release Candidate if you want to test build before
it gets released.

His complete email reply to tbb-dev:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tbb-dev/2020-February/001046.html

Thanks,
-- 
clematis (0x7e96fd2400fe7b59)

Reply via email to