On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:39:51PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > I tried to add a debug package for shells/bash, but the result would > only contain debug data for some loadable modules and skip the actual > bash binary. > > Oh, of course. It is marked @shell and not @bin in the PLIST. > > We could change OpenBSD/PackingElement.pm to add @shell to the > binary types... but then does a shell have to be a binary? psh > from shells/perlsh clearly isn't. > > So... uh?
As a hack, you could install bash twice, as a hardlink annotated with @bin ? Otherwise, it could be written and recognized as a supplementary annotation, like @comment no checksum.
