On Tue, Feb 25 2020, Paco Esteban <p...@e1e0.net> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2020, Aaron Bieber wrote: > >> On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 09:24:19 +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: >> > Hi ports@, >> > >> > www/hugo needs a volunteer/maintainer to update and build a new tarball >> > with all bundle/vendor dependencies. If you need distfile hosting feel >> > free to mail me. >> > >> > I would be happy if someone would take responsibility for this port. >> > >> > RS >> > >> >> Here ya go: >> >> https://deftly.net/dist/hugo-0.65.3.tar.gz >> >> I started working on a "proxy-proxy" which one will be able to use to request >> a vendored tarball by passing in a module name. >> >> Plan is to have something like: >> >> ftp https://proxy.suah.dev/github.com/gohugoio/hugo >> >> Which would give you a tarball likek the one linked above (for the latest >> version of 'github.com/gohugoio/hugo'. >> >> Anyway - it isn't ready yet, but hopefully soon :D > > Following this. Here's a diff for the updated version. > > - generated new tarball (as per abieber@ instructions) and hosted it > myself > - Added myself as maintainer. > - removed all existing patches, they do not apply anymore. They seem to > be ok upstream now. > - about tests, I was able to make them run (again, as per abieber's > instructions), but there are some that fail either because the test > suite tries to download stuff from the internet or because $WRKSRC is > not a git repo. We may fix the former, but the later will imply > invalidate those test I guess. For now I left the NO_TEST alone. > > About hugo itself, the changes list is endless. I only tested it > lightly with a test site and all seems to work fine. I could use > another set of eyes here. > > Comments ? ok ?
ports-wise this looks correct. I was expecting more feedback from hugo users but maybe you got some off-list. And if you didn't get any feedback there's an easy way to get some. ;) ok jca@ -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
