Got it, have added updated diff. aisha
Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/wireguard-go/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.13 Makefile --- Makefile 30 Mar 2020 14:33:11 -0000 1.13 +++ Makefile 17 Apr 2020 18:42:22 -0000 @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.13 2020/03/30 14:33:11 jasper Exp $ -ONLY_FOR_ARCHS = amd64 - COMMENT = implementation of WireGuard in Go DISTNAME = wireguard-go-0.0.20200320 On 4/17/20 12:53 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020/04/17 11:34, Aisha Tammy wrote: >> Upstream seems to have fixed the bug mentioned in the 1.4 change >> which removed aarch64 and i386, but I've only tested on aarch64 >> so I've added that to the Makefile. >> >> I've been using this on Pine A64 LTS model for the past few weeks >> and have not encountered any error so it is safe to add aarch64. >> >> comments? OK? >> >> aisha >> >> Index: Makefile >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/wireguard-go/Makefile,v >> retrieving revision 1.13 >> diff -u -p -r1.13 Makefile >> --- Makefile 30 Mar 2020 14:33:11 -0000 1.13 >> +++ Makefile 17 Apr 2020 15:21:58 -0000 >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >> # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.13 2020/03/30 14:33:11 jasper Exp $ >> >> -ONLY_FOR_ARCHS = amd64 >> +ONLY_FOR_ARCHS = amd64 aarch64 >> >> COMMENT = implementation of WireGuard in Go >> >> > > Better to remove ONLY_FOR_ARCHS completely, we can readd it if there's > still a problem with i386 or (32 bit) arm. > > It is more that they were using old vendored libraries rather than a bug > as such. Which is sadly the norm with the annoying new languages. >
