On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:51:06PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 06:48:34PM -0700, Greg Steuck wrote: > > > here's an update to poppler-0.89.0. Survived a bulk build on amd64, > > > but I coould'nt yet test it (because of flaky internet, and I'm > > > doing the builds on a remote machine, not at home). > > > > > > According to check_sym, library bumps are fine. > > > > > > I also added a patch for qt5/src/CMakeLists.txt to drop the hardcoded > > > SOVERSION, like rsadowski@ did for glib/CMakeLists.txt, to work > > > around spurious build failures. > > > > > > Any tests are appreciated. > > > > I tried to build the poppler package on a -current (+ pirofti@'s gettime) > > system and ran into a problem. I have libreoffice installed, so the > > previous version of poppler is in use. > > [...] > > ===> Building package for poppler-qt5-0.89.0 > > Create /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/poppler-qt5-0.89.0.tgz > > Creating package poppler-qt5-0.89.0 > > |library poppler.64.0 not found > > | /usr/local/lib/libpoppler.so.63.0 (poppler-0.88.0): bad major > > Direct dependencies for poppler-qt5-0.89.0 resolve to poppler-0.88.0 > > qtbase-5.13.2p0 > [...] > > So it looks like poppler is one of those ports that can't be built > when an older version is already installed, because it picks up the > (old, installed) libpoppler.so.* from /usr/local/lib. > > No idea wether it's worth to fix this.
Depends whether it's trivial to fix or not... People building bulks are not affected, and it's very simple to build stuff in a proot anyway, so if it takes more than 15mn to fix, just drop it.
