> Deployed this on my server and I don't see any issue so far. In fact, > prosody is communicating over TLS without problems, so I'd it's OK > from prosody side.
thanks for testing, i have just committed the luasec update. > Regarding setting NO_TEST, bsd.port.mk(5) says it should be set to Yes > "only for ports with no regression test", so I'm not sure if using Yes > here would be an abuse. yes, right. maybe we should add a comment showing that failure is kwown.
? prosofy.diff Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/prosody/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.57 diff -u -p -r1.57 Makefile --- Makefile 2 Jun 2020 07:22:46 -0000 1.57 +++ Makefile 23 Jun 2020 11:16:39 -0000 @@ -20,7 +20,10 @@ MODLUA_RUN_DEPENDS+= databases/luadbi \ devel/luafs \ security/luasec \ textproc/luaexpat>=1.3.0 + +# fails, depends on busted not yet in TEST_DEPENDS = ${MODLUA_RUN_DEPENDS} + WANTLIB+= crypto idn CONFIGURE_STYLE=simple