Wietse Venema via Postfix-devel wrote in
 <[email protected]>:
 |Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-devel:
 |> Is there a desire to add these 250- strings?  For at least limits
 |> which are implemented anyway?
 |
 |The server side is trivial: announce smtpd_recipient_limit (1000).
 |The message_size_limit value is already announced in EHLO.
 |
 |However, the client side would have to respect very low limits like
 |one recipient per transaction. That effs up the scheduling of
 |deliveries a bit.
 |
 |I see this more as a way for mail receivers to throttle senders.

You go together with John Klensin who wrote that RFC; he covers
this and more cases in "Security Considerations".

Then again (and who said clients have to respect the limits),
and very much unfortunately so, large parts of the IETF have no
problem with, and even push forward, even by standard means,
single recipient delivery all the way through.  *Per se*.
There are "single click unsubscribe wonders" and more to come,
likely, that effectively throttle down to single recipient
delivery.  In my opinion large parts of the (email part of
the) IETF are driven by the desire to ensure tracking of users
over as many corners as possible is possible, and best even
cryptographically so.  Except SMTP itself anything is a heavily
blown mess, and increasing.

It is like the RFC says, that many installations have, or seem to
have, limits far below what the SMTP RFC says.  This is no
problem, you submit, at some time you get the "too many
recipients" code, and that is that.  Whether you redo MAIL FROM
with the rest, and/or redo HELO/EHLO plus the rest, and/or even
reconnect plus the rest, there is a queue, and either it gets
worked, or some recipients are bounced back.

But, in a world of "organizational trust", these limits can
be used.  And be trusted accordingly, to the minimum extend
of single recipient delivery.  I for myself dreamed of being
able to "splice perfectly" the new DKIM "per recipient host"
based upon information provided by the server.  (That is:
to at least minimize problems, and create "write once"
replay-attack-mitigation caches on recipient domains.)

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
_______________________________________________
Postfix-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to