On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:28:58PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Victor Duchovni <victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com>:
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:34:01AM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >
> > > * Ralf Hildebrandt <postfix-users@postfix.org>:
> > > > With today's clients, is broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
> > > > still required? Which clients require it anyway?
> > >
> > > Outlook 2000 to 2003
> > > Outlook Express ? to 6
> > >
> > > Haven't checked Outlook 2007 yet.
> >
> > A user of mine will be testing that shortly, I'll let you know what we
> > find.
>
> So what did you find :) ?
SASL PLAIN works for Outlook 2007 without:
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
The full set of SASL settings in Postfix is:
main.cf:
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
cyrus_sasl_config_path = ${config_directory}
smtpd.conf:
pwcheck_method: saslauthd
mech_list: PLAIN
Of course "saslauthod -a pam" needs a PAM stack, ... but this is no
longer Postfix specific.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
