hello guys
hello I'm fine and everything is going well on the whole better. I want to evoke a thought higher of us. I followed the outstanding issues lately on hotmail and problems of validation spf (the spf is: do the simplest and shortest possible). I noticed the strange behavior in my validation spf my spf returns this ~]$ host -ttxt lists.fakessh.eu lists.fakessh.eu descriptive text "spf2.0/pra ip4:46.105.34.177 ip4:91.121.7.86 ?all" lists.fakessh.eu descriptive text "v=spf1 ip4:46.105.34.177 ip4:91.121.7.86 ?all" lists.fakessh.eu descriptive text "spf2.0/mfrom ip4:46.105.34.177 ip4:91.121.7.86 ~all" I wonder this thing describes why the standard if I remember correctly if there is no presence of spf2 valid spf1 more I have noticed this by looking logs of my mail server in my case some providers only valid spf1 abstain from spf2, meet the other two and therefore ignore the ok spf1 (often time error sid Marid openssl mailling often) to meet the other spf2 but only test the spf1 and are ok and still another test both as hotmail and we are left with paradoxes room with sending malicious spam spf1 ok senderid ok not tagged spam (feat exploit http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/1739/spf2virii.jpg my modified version of nc ) about spf I think we should amend the standards for testing spf1 and or spf2 Wietse ? when do you think -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://about.me/fakessh
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
