Peter:
> On 31/05/22 7:14 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > How urgent is this?
>
> Not very, targetting 3.8.0 should be sufficient.
Implementing this for a stable release would never be an option.
> > I think that we can do better than maintaining multiple parallel
> > lists. For example, use one list and indicate per DNSXL that they
> > can be only used for one kind of client IP address. The default
> > should remain both as it is now.
>
> Can you elaborate on how that would work?
Something in the postscreen_dnsbl_sites list that says "this DNSXL
does/doesnot answer queries about a certain class of IP address".For
example instead of site[filter]*weight, whether another suffix, or
something like {site[filter]*weight, q=a, client=ipv6, timeout=nn}.
Wietse
