Hello Regina, thanks for the answer. I'm not a big fan of bat files, but I do have to use the zip version and not the .exe. So maybe a small update of the README.txt to indicate how to get postgis working without the bat files.
What we did is get the .bat from 2.1.1 and past it in the 2.1.2, then run it. Then we could use the CREATE EXTENSION on a fresh database. What would be the new workflow? Cheers, Rémi 2014-11-12 21:04 GMT+01:00 Paragon Corporation <l...@pcorp.us>: > Remi, > That was intentional. The main reason is that with windows systems being > security paranoid, the copy would often fail and it would be hard to see > looking at a batch script console. > > Also now that we have CREATE EXTENSION it was no longer an issue trying to > find the scripts to run, which was the main reason for the batch script. > > Did you find it useful? If so I can put them back. > > Thanks, > Regina > http://www.postgis.us > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* postgis-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto: > postgis-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Rémi Cura > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 12, 2014 11:41 AM > *To:* PostGIS Users Discussion > *Subject:* [postgis-users] no .bat in windows zip installers > > Hey everybody. > The 2 bat files > makepostgisdb_using_extensions.bat > and > makepostgisdb.bat > > seems to have vanished from the zip release file for version newer than > 2.1.1 (postgis-bundle-pg93x64-2.1.1) > > I'm I missing something? > thanks, > cheers, > Rémi-C > > > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users >
_______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users