On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:01:56AM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 08:38:54PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Sandro Santilli <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 08:46:08AM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > > >> Dear admin, > > >> the list, as many @osgeo were, is misconfigured for its DMARC. I suggest > > >> to > > >> change one of the settings. > > > > > > Hi Paolo, thanks for the heads up. > > > I've followed Markus Neteler's recipe here: > > > https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2475#comment:43 > > > > > > My understanding is that this should ONLY affect the emails coming > > > from a domain with DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy so your reply to > > > this email might have the From munged while mine might not. > > > > > > This mail is sent to postgis-users so we can use it also as a test :) > > > > test failed because your domain does not sign with dkim. > > Test succeeded as it shows From is not changed for me ;) > But it is incomplete until Paolo replies, I guess. > > > In all seriousness, just configure the list not to modify messages, > > other than adding List-Foo headers, and the problems all go away. > > I'm actually ok with this change, users might need to update their > filters but parsing headers should be easier than subject or footer, > will bring it up for vote on PSC.
Still, I think this should be tested by the reporter as I'm really flying blind when it comes to DMARC. In particular, I wonder why Mailman does not include a "do not modify subject" and "do not add footer" as options in the dmarc_moderation_action options list. --strk; _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
