I've wondered about this issue in JTS as well. On one hand it's nice to require a certain level of validity, so that validity doesn't have to be checked for every operation, and so the user doesn't get unexpected failures later in processing. On the other hand, it's convenient to be able to represent any possibly geometry in the model, to allow cleaning to be performed.

One middle ground might be to force rings to be closed by adding a closing point. This preserves all input information, and allows the problem to either be ignored (if the closed ring is valid) or fixed using the same approach as for an invalid geometry.

Another option is to ensure that the tools loading the data are able to correct this problem. Although they probably would correct it by simply adding a closing point - in which case the DB might as well do it.


Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
Paragon Corporation wrote:

Mark Cave-Ayland,
I forget were we planning on making this a switch option in later versions of PostGIS? So that you could bring in polygons with unclosed rings and fix them in the db?

Well the result of the earlier investigation showed that having a switch will just cause more problems than it will solve so this isn't going to work :(

I've always been a great believer in keeping the checking reasonably strict in an attempt to try and maintain the quality of geometries within the database, however recently there appears to be an increasing use cases on the list of people wanting to perform cleanup/processing directly in the database and it would be stupid to ignore this.

I think that if both Oracle Spatial and MS-SQL allow geometries to be stored with deformed features (i.e. incomplete rings) then I could be persuaded that the ERROR upon insertion should be downgraded to a WARNING instead. Would anyone like to check this behaviour and report back?


ATB,

Mark.


--
Martin Davis
Senior Technical Architect
Refractions Research, Inc.
(250) 383-3022

_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

Reply via email to