On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:09:30PM +0100, William Humphrey Temperley wrote:
> Practical means "getting stuff done" in my book. Open source is always my > first port of call, but I won't conform to a religion. I'm looking forward > to trying out your topology work - but when it's practical to do so! I've been discussing this earlier this morning and figured that you can probably get this done pretty easily with PostGIS 2.0, by adding a topology-aware ST_Simplify version so and avoid creating persistent simplified topology schemas. > I agree it is a shame that it is rare for open source software to be funded > by public institutions, especially when even small change for them would > make a difference. I can't comment on the EC stance on this. Incidentally, most of the 2.0 topology work was funded by the Italian Tuscany Region, and there are actually an handful of other public institutions among the so called "corporate sponsors". It's just a shame not to see the JRC in there... --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users