Not included at the moment. Would require putting an entry in the loader_generate_tables and also companion structures for each table in tiger schema and mostly a lot of testing mostly because census seems to like to change field names etc. every year. It's something we've thought about just adding these common entries, but having them possibly disabled by default so people could choose to load them if they wanted. If you are interested you can put in a ticket: http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ And mark it under tiger geocoder and version 2.1. We don't plan to make any more changes (aside from major bug fixes) to the tiger_2010 (pacakged with 2.0) since tiger_2011 is already vastly different and more efficient in the way it loads and the client that is funding most of our work on tiger geocoder is using the tiger_2011 one packaged with PostGIS 2.1 (though using it on a PostGIS 2.0 database) Thanks, Regina and Leo http://www.postgis.us
_____ From: postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net [mailto:postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Eric Aspengren Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:20 AM To: PostGIS Users Discussion Subject: [postgis-users] Whew Ok, so, I've finally gotten a functional geocoder up and running. Has anyone had any luck using the scripts provided to load other Tiger files (Congressional Districts, Statehouse Districts, Etc.)? -- Eric Aspengren (402) 478-VOTE ericas...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
