On Friday 27 April 2012 10:51:22 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 4/27/2012 7:35 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 27 April 2012 09:29:13 Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > >> --- a/configure.ac > >> +++ b/configure.ac > >> > >> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNIL], [libnl-1],[],[ > >> > >> - PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNIL], [libnl-2.0],[] ,[ > >> - PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNIL], [libnl-3.0],[] > >> ,[AC_MSG_ERROR([libnl is required but was not found])]) + > >> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNIL], > >> [libnl-2.0],[AC_DEFINE([HAVE_LIBNL20],[1],[Define if you have libnl-2.0 > >> or higher])] ,[ + PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNIL], [libnl-3.0, > >> libnl-genl-3.0],[AC_DEFINE([HAVE_LIBNL20],[1],[Define if you have > >> libnl-3.0 or higher])] ,[AC_MSG_ERROR([libnl is required but was not > >> found])]) > >> > >> ]) > >> > >> ]) > > > > that really needs some line wrapping > > nah my screen is -> <- this wide.. > > we're not google+.... > > if it makes it more readable, I rather have things on one line than > artificially broken up.
wrapping+indenting at "[" boundaries is accepted autoconf practice, and which
you've already done here:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNIL], [libnl-1],[],[
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNIL], [libnl-2.0],[] ,[
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNIL], [libnl-3.0 ...
so continuing that practice makes sense
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Power mailing list Power@bughost.org https://bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
