Sean McBride / 2005/10/06 / 06:52 PM wrote: >I'm afraid I can't agree... the list is public, isn't it? And public >means, well, public. :)
What is the definition of public here? If the list do not allow non registered member to post, how come it is public? If I knew the list archive is open to public, and whatever I post here can be access from anyone outside of this list members then I have a problem. >Well, that's a google bug then, not an argument against having a list archive. I don't know why you eliminated the portion of my original post that you quoted, where I said I also admin a user group which archive is only available to members, and that's what I want. Any reason you didn't respond to that portion? -- - Hiro [PROTECTED] <[PROTECTED]> <[PROTECTED]>
