Matthias Schmidt said: >Maybe someone wants to wrtie a Apple Script to "debug" such messages in PM ?
I'm not sure how to do that. How could one discern between an inline "1" that originates from the entourage bug and such that are _meant_ to be a raised 1 (which is what we are talking about here I think)? I looked at the problem with some messages that have "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable" and those would code "I'm" also in the source just as that (using the Show Source script). Is this correct behaviour? Entourage messages would code "I'm" as "I=B9m" in the source. Is this the bug? The proper ISO- 8859-1 code for " ' "is "=27", isn't it? I see a possible solution with messages that have been sent with Entourage could be temporarily changed to source and the "=B9" replaced with the correct char for the encoding in question, before the message is re-saved. I'm assuming here that intended raised " 1 " would probably never be encoded as "=B9". When would an app use that code for something? Maths? PM 5.2.1 | OS X 10.3.9 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD
