Paul, some decorum please.  Now you're just spamming the list (i.e. the
rest of us) with your profanities.

-ben

Paul Schatzkin (mobile) wrote at 11:19 AM (-0600) on 1/19/10:

>AT LEAST MY APPLE MAIL DOESNT CONTINUOUSLY SPAM ME.
>
>--PS
>
>Sent from my iPhone, which is why it's so short.
>
>On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Michael Lewis <mich...@offbalance.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2010, at 10:20 AM, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, if Apple Mail was the yardstick against all other mail
>>> clients
>>> were to be measured, why would anyone be using something else? I
>>> for one
>>> am glad there are alternatives to Apple Mail. PM could surely be
>>> improved, but making it more like Apple Mail is not what I would
>>> call an
>>> improvement.
>>>
>>> - Michael
>>
>> I agree. While I have switched to Apple Mail for the time being, and
>> I agree PowerMail could use some new doodads, I don't think making
>> it show all HTML mail stuff is good -- at least without options/
>> preferences for some heavy customization of what is and isn't shown.
>>
>> I've stayed on the list because I do like PowerMail and want to
>> watch what is happening with it. I hope it remains an alternative to
>> HTML/styled email (which I still hate despite going to Apple Mail to
>> deal with some mail I get now :( ), with enough HTML capability to
>> make several users happy, but the ability to turn it off in bits and
>> pieces as needed by others like me.
>>
>> --
>> Michael Lewis
>> mich...@offbalance.com

--
Ben Kennedy (chief magician)
zygoat creative technical services
http://www.zygoat.ca



Reply via email to