Palo Verde provides the following response:

We have seen variants of this phenomenon when doing in field RWP changes and as 
Joe indicated, when you are using a substation on Sentinel you want to look to 
see how your parameters compare to your standard log in stations.  We use an 
LDM-250 (a 220 built inside a housing to preclude electronic dosimeter movement 
during log-in).

When we change RWPs in the field the system requires that the worker to remove 
the dosimeter from reader and to start the log in transaction over again.  
Because we have had events where workers have left with the dosimeter in pause 
we put in some additional corrective actions for in-field RWP changes such as 
requiring a second, independent check by another Radiation Protection 
Technician to make sure that the electronic dosimeter in on.  We also set up 
DMC Viewer stations in the field with an LDM-220 to allow verification of a 
dosimeter's status, i.e., running, correct RWP and task, alarm status, etc.

For help with the in-field substation settings, contact Phil Wall (623) 
393-2627, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Seth


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Danek, Joe
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 7:09 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Powernet: RE: ED Turned Off in RCA

We haven't seen this here.  Do you know if they were using a sub station?  
There are preference settings for sub stations which will turn the dosimeter 
off when changing RWPs or leave it on and just reset the set points and dose 
total depending on which you select, which may be a contributor to this if it 
happened at a substation and the preference was set to turn it off.

When changing RWPs at the primary station the system requires the worker to 
remove the dosimeter from near the reader in order to start a new log in 
transaction.

We use the DMC-2000S with the LDM -200 reader, the log in screen has a message 
that displays not to remove the dosimeter until it has been programmed, the 
screen turns green and states access permitted when it's ready.

Cathy Dole
Senior Radiation Protection Analyst
ALARA Coordinator


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Courtenay, Christopher C
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 7:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jonas, Kathy L; Litaker, Jeffrey R; Morgan, Steven L; Marek, Jeff
Subject: Powernet: ED Turned Off in RCA

Duke Energy would like to know if anyone has or is experiencing the following:

ED (electronic dosimeter) problems being experienced when changing RWPs 
(Radiation Work Permits).

When change RWPs the ED is turned off and back on to write the new RWP dose and 
dose rate alarm set points to the ED.

Currently, the following is randomly occurring:  After the ED is turned off and 
the worker is logged onto the new RWP in Sentinel,  the following error message 
occurs on the kiosk   'ACCESS DENIED   The Dosimeter has been removed from the 
Reader!'. The worker has not removed the ED from the reader. The results is the 
worker is logged into the RCA/RCZ with an inactivated ED.

Duke Energy uses Sentinel 1.09 and the DMC2000S ED.  Has anyone else 
experienced this on a more than "normal" basis?  What is the age of your 
dosimeters?  What LDM readers do you use?  What is the configuration of your 
LDM readers and access stations? (Duke uses an LDM101 shell with LDM220 reader 
inside, facing down, on some stations)  Any experience or insight would be 
greatly appreciated.

Chris Courtenay
Engineer, Duke Energy
980-875-5005
"To the optimist, the glass is half full.  To the pessimist, the glass is half 
empty.  To the engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be."

--- NOTICE ---

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain confidential, 
privileged or proprietary information.  If you have received it in error, 
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original and any copy or 
printout.  Unintended recipients are prohibited from making any other use of 
this e-mail.  Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no 
viruses are present in this e-mail, we accept no liability for any loss or 
damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments, or for any delay or 
errors or omissions in the contents which result from e-mail transmission.

Reply via email to