Duke Energy determined neutron spectrums for ISFSIs at all 3 stations (Catawba, 
McGuire, Oconee) most recently back in 2008/2009.  The majority of neutron dose 
received occurs at ISFSIs.  ISFSI calibration factor is more conservative than 
containment calibration factor, therefore ISFSI factor is used.  If anyone has 
any questions or would like to see the analysis, please email me directly.

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Chris Courtenay
Engineer, Duke Energy
980-875-5005
"To the optimist, the glass is half full.  To the pessimist, the glass is half 
empty.  To the engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be."

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Robert J Gunter
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 10:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Powernet: RE: ISFSI/Dry Storage Neutron Spectrum

Interestingly, we had a small issue that became a large one due to the 
influence of the DOE....  We had a very small alara limit for neutrons around a 
bunch of UF6 cylinders.  The dosimeters we used had Li-6 so they were very 
responsive to thermal neutrons but the calibration said that the spectrum was 
all fast.  I suspected that the neutrons were being moderated by skyshine 
causing there to be an excess of thermals that make the dose look higher than 
before.  I don't know if you will have that many neutrons as this was a few 
acres of cyclinders....  Just a thought.  I wanted to do an experiment with 
some dosimeters just to see what we would find, but never got around to it.

Good luck,

Rob

Robert J. Gunter, MSc, CHP
CHP Consultants/CHP Dosimetry
www.chpconsultants.com
www.chpdosimetry.com
Toll Free: (888) 766-4833
Fax:  (866) 491-9913
Cel:  (865) 387-0028
[email protected]

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
BREHM, DAVID M
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 7:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Powernet: RE: ISFSI/Dry Storage Neutron Spectrum

I too am very interested in this.  We did not do a neutron energy study last 
dry-cask campaign and, in retrospect, I really wish we had.  We will be doing a 
study as part of the next campaign, but any data out there (we use the 
DMC-2000GN and OSLN) to get us closer to the mark will help a lot.

One learning to share, the cask configuration changed from the first campaign 
(where a study was performed) to the second & most recent campaign.  Among 
other things, the changed cask configuration improved the gamma shielding, but 
also had the effect of lowering the average neutron energy without really 
changing the neutron flux.  The end result is that field neutron monitoring -- 
electronic dosimeter & portable instruments and record dosimeter -- were quite 
a bit different.

David Brehm
Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station
Supervisor - Radiological Equipment & Dosimetry
Office: 402.533.7582
Cellular: 402.214.0107
Pager: 402.561.3310

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Holmes, Stephen J
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 2:49 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Powernet: ISFSI/Dry Storage Neutron Spectrum

Who out there has performed a neutron energy spectrum study specific to dry 
storage processes? We have good data on our containment spectrum, but have not 
yet done a specific study for dry storage. We are looking at ensuring our 
dosimetry/instruments are set up to respond properly to the dry storage neutron 
energies.

The only plant I know of that has done this is Kewaunee. If anyone else has, I 
would appreciate any learnings you can share. If you haven't, and you have a 
good justification for not doing it, I am interested in that as well.

Thanks,
-Steve

Stephen J Holmes
Sr. Plant Health Physicist
RE Ginna NPP
Constellation Energy Nuclear Group
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
585-771-3577; 585-545-1661 (cell)


>>> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal, 
>>> professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for 
>>> the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the 
>>> information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the 
>>> sender. CEG-IP1

________________________________
This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary 
information and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly 
stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, or 
acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that 
disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Reply via email to