From: COTTON, DONDI L
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 3:15 AM
To: RICKETTS, BOBBY R G
Subject: RE: Generally Licensed Devices - Question

Bob,

We control them as Licensed Material under our site license.

Dondi

________________________________
From: RICKETTS, BOBBY R G
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:51 AM
To: COTTON, DONDI L
Subject: FW: Generally Licensed Devices - Question

I believe this is right up your alley.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Johnson, Graham T
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Powernet: Generally Licensed Devices - Question

I appreciate the responses received to my question below about leak testing 
Ni-63 sources.  I now have a follow-up question.

Background:
When investigating the proper leak test methods for Ni-63 sources in our site 
explosives detectors, we also investigated the regulatory requirements for 
these Generally Licensed Devices (GLDs).  Our approach has been to receive 
these GLDs and consider them as under our 10CFR50 site license and control them 
as licensed material.

RIS 2005-11 (REQUIREMENTS FOR POWER REACTOR LICENSEES IN POSSESSION OF DEVICES 
SUBJECT TO THE GENERAL LICENSE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 31.5) was issued  
specifically because some sites were not controlling these GLDs properly.

After researching the regulatory requirements of GLDs, we have questioned 
whether we should control these GSDs as separate from our 10CFR50 license OR 
control them as under our 10CFR50 license.    The leak test and inventory 
requirements would be the same in either case.  However, we believe there may 
be other implications such as transfer requirements and notification 
requirements if one was misplaced.

Question:
Does your site consider GLDs as under your 10CFR50 license (i.e. licensed 
material) or do you control them in separate program or process?

Thank you,
Graham Johnson

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Johnson, Graham T
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 1:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Powernet: Leak testing Ni-63 Sources

Duke Energy would like to know what process other sites use for leak testing 
Ni-63 sources.  Specifically, what type of smear and what method used to count 
the smear.

Thank you,
Graham Johnson

Reply via email to