Diablo Canyon uses ...

MIDAS with an in-house front end for auto polling plant parameter effluent data 
and met data entry, switchable to manual entry mode.

Our current version does not have multiunit capability, nor multisource 
capability

Or backup/alternative software is QuickDose, an in house model, - a straight 
line Gaussian model using an Excel Spread sheet.

Future MUDA options in order of preference -

Long term; 1) upgrade MIDAS to take advantage of their MUDA capability 
including them developing the interface for auto polling site data, 2) modify 
the current in house front end to perform multiunit/ multisource term 
compilation that feeds total Ci/sec and met data to MIDAS for plume dispersion.

Interim measure, rewrite procedures and training for using current models in a 
way the adds up the projected doses from individually calculated release points 
from individual release point runs.

Curtis Hansen
Sr. EP Coordinator - Radiation Dose Assessment
Diablo Canyon Power Plant
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
805-545-6278 work
805-801-8185 cell




From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of BJ 
Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 3:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Powernet: Dose Assessment Software Survey

North Anna

What is your Current Dose Assessment Software Solution? MIDAS
Does the software have Multi-Unit Capability? Yes
Does the software have Multi-Source Capability? Yes

If your software does not have Full Capability Dose Assessment have you 
identified an alternative software solution? N/A


Barbara J. Thompson

North Anna Power Station

1022 Haley Drive

Mineral, Va 23117

Nuclear Specialist

Email:  [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Phone:  540-894-2638


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 3:13 PM
To: powernet@
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Powernet: Dose Assessment Software Survey

Folks,

With regard to the multi-unit/multi-source dose assessment, I would like to 
perform a brief survey to see what software solution people intend on using to 
establish the capability.  This could be useful for future 
benchmarking/alignment opportunities, bulk purchasing opportunities, etc.  I 
will put together the summary of the responses by 5/31, and send out the 
results for all to benefit.  I appreciate you taking the time to complete this 
survey and any additional comments are welcome.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Licensee Name:

What is your Current Dose Assessment Software Solution?
Does the software have Multi-Unit Capability?
Does the software have Multi-Source Capability?

If your software does not have Full Capability Dose Assessment have you 
identified an alternative software solution?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example filled out survey:

Licensee Name: Southern California Edison (2 units)

What is your Current Dose Assessment Software Solution? Raddose V
Does the software have Multi-Unit Capability? Not full capability.  Dose 
assessment can be performed currently on each unit then and manually sum the 
output
Does the software have Multi-Source Capability: Yes, up to 3 sources per unit

If you software does not have Full Capability Dose Assessment, have you 
identified an alternate software solution? TBD.  Potentially upgrade Raddose V 
or new software package

Thanks,

Joe Torkelsen
Project Manager of SONGS Fukushima Event Response
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
Southern California Edison, W53
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
PAX: 82930
Cell: 631-764-3634

Sandra Sewell, CHP
Radiation Protection Technical
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
(949) 368-9111
PAX 89-111 ----------------------------------- Powernet - a service of the 
Health Physics Society Power Reactor Section Powernet archives at 
http://www.mail- 
archive.com/[email protected]/<mailto:archive.com/[email protected]/> Reply to: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> If Questions, contact Mike Russell, 
CHP at [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may 
be legally confidential and/or privileged and does not in any case represent a 
firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender 
without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The 
information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and 
access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, 
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this 
information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that 
you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.


PG&E is committed to protecting our customers' privacy. 
To learn more, please visit http://www.pge.com/about/company/privacy/customer/

Reply via email to