I'll probe that, good idea Glen. It was from the sample sink. Jack
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vickers, Glen:(GenCo-Nuc) Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 12:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Powernet: 3030P beta response Perhaps moisture content in the smears that reduced over time? While the thin window GM and PIPS detectors are both good detectors, they won't have the same lower energy response... Glen Vickers Exelon Corp RP Technical Lead, CHP 815-216-2723 (work/cell) From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of McCarthy, John:(GenCo-Nuc) Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 9:05 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Powernet: 3030P beta response Has anyone experienced a significant difference between Ludlum 3030P beta response and traditional beta-gamma detectors/scalers. We have seen a significant under-response with the 3030P as compared to frisker when counting a smear from an electron capture area. Two days later the instrument results were the same. Jack This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal, professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. -EXCIP
