I don't think a source being an exempt quantity provides any relief once you possess it. If you lose byproduct material, you'll be talking to your Plant Mgr and going through the reporting requirements for the regs like any other source, but just won't trip any high-level triggers like any other low level source. I'd treat all sources the same regardless of activity to keep the program simple and clean.
Glen Vickers Exelon Corp RP Technical Lead, CHP 815-216-2723 (work/cell) From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sutton, Craig Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Powernet: Non-exempt radioactive sources DCPP would like to know the following regarding non-exempt radioactive sources at your site: 1. Does your site make a distinction procedurally or physically, (such as a different marking), between exempt and non-exempt radioactive sources? 2. If so, what limit do you use as the basis for identifying a source as non-exempt? (i.e., 10 CFR 30.70/71, 10 CFR 20 Appendix C, etc.) 3. If so, what is the distinction used (marking, location, procedural controls, etc.)? Respectfully, Craig D. Sutton Radioactive Materials Engineer Pacific Gas & Electric Company Diablo Canyon Power Plant MS 104/2/216 PO Box 56 Avila Beach, CA 93424 P: 805.545.4208 | C: 805.748.0603 | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ________________________________ PG&E is committed to protecting our customers' privacy. To learn more, please visit http://www.pge.com/about/company/privacy/customer/ ________________________________ This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal, professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. -EXCIP
