I have enough experience to check the neutron energy range they are rated for. Some that I have tested don’t work or are not rated for neutrons <70 keV, which is the bulk of our neutron energy spectrum outside the bioshield.
We are pursuing the use of classic REM-balls with newer meters attached. Heather Jackson, CHP, RRPT Sr. Health Physicist Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant 623-393-6076 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas J Vandermey Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 6:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Powernet: neutron meter question Does anyone have experience with the newer types of neutron survey meters which are lighter than REM Balls? Such as the RADeCO Pro-Lite made by Fuji, or the Ludlum Model 2363 with 42-41L detector? (Or any thoughts about the advantages of the newer model REM Ball--Ludlum 2241-4?) Please let me know which type of neutron meter you use, especially if it's one of the newer models, and how you like it. Thanks in advance!!!! Tom VanderMey, CHP Principal Radiological Engineer DTE Energy, Fermi 2 734-586-1539 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: ----- --- NOTICE --- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain confidential, privileged or proprietary information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original and any copy or printout. Unintended recipients are prohibited from making any other use of this e-mail. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this e-mail, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments, or for any delay or errors or omissions in the contents which result from e-mail transmission.
