Mmmmm....From Callaway.  I'm in the mood to stir up a hornets nest this 
morning. .......Let us see if this can spin off to a new discussion.

To answer Chucks question.  Callaway does NOT consider a contaminated hard hat 
to be a PCE.  This is specifically and clearly stated in our procedure.  Yes, 
we are aware of INPO C.2.d (Page 74) specifying that a contaminated hardhat 
should be a PCE.  We disagree.  The hard hat is a safety device that is several 
inches away from the body.  It is entirely reasonable to expect a worker to 
handle the hard hat while inside the Contaminated Area, or even fall off of the 
head to the floor of a CA.  It would be entirely reasonable to require the 
worker to adjust or re-don the hard hat with contaminated gloves.  Therefore 
counting a contaminated hard hat as a PCE is self-defeating and of zero added 
value.

We have never seen skin or hair contamination from this, so the risk is 
minimal.  Additionally, the hard hat is made of thick plastic (generally), that 
shields any beta dose.  The EPRI contamination response guidelines are focused 
on skin dose,  so again, contamination of a hard hat presents little risk.  
Whether or not our good friends from Atlanta will make an issue of this is for 
the future to tell.

To answer Palo Verde's original question,
Callaway does allow use of personal hard hats in Contaminated Areas, we also 
provide RCA hard hats that stay in the RCA (sometimes they stay in the 
contaminated area).  We have janitors clean and disinfect the hard hats 
following use and restock the "donning bins".  The process is pretty much the 
same both outage and routine operations, except during outages we set up the 
don and doff bins inside the Contaminated Area, the worker enters the turnstile 
at the Containment, and if they need one, grabs a hard hat at the don barrel.  
The hard hat is removed at dress out and placed in the doff barrel.

SO! What say you?  Others that do not count a contaminated hard hat as a PCE, 
what is your motivation and justification?  Or for that matter, those on the 
other side, what is yours?

Most respectfully,  Dewey.
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Dewey Thompson
Staff HP
Radiation Protection Department
T 314.225.1061
F 573.676.4484
E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Creamer, Charles E
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 2:33 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Powernet: RE: hard hats in contaminated areas

Browns Ferry uses both designated hardhats and personal hardhats.  For some 
areas with higher levels of contamination like the drywells we always use 
designated yellow hard hats.  We have hard hat covers available when using a 
personnel hard hat.

If you use personnel hardhats in c-zones and they get contaminated, how do you 
not count them as a Personnel Contamination?


Chuck Creamer
Charles E. Creamer
Health Physicist
Tennessee Valley Authority
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
P.O. Box 2000 (Mail Stop NAB-1G-BFN)
Decatur, Al. 35609-2000
Phone: 256-729-2983
Fax:  256-729-3101
Pager: 1-800-323-4853, pin 30-053
mailto:[email protected]

REMEMBER - You don't know what you don't know

This electronic message transmission contains information which may be TVA 
SENSITIVE, TVA RESTRICTED or TVA CONFIDENTIAL. Any misuse or unauthorized 
disclosure can result in both civil and criminal penalties. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use 
of the content of this information is prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify me immediately by email and delete the 
original message.



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 4:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Powernet: hard hats in contaminated areas

Palo Verde is looking for the industry standard on hard hats in contaminated 
areas:

Do you have people use their own, or do you provide hard hats for use in CAs?

Do you handle this issue differently during outage vs. online?

Thanks for your time!

Heather Jackson, CHP, RRPT
Sr. Health Physicist
Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant
623-393-6076




--- NOTICE ---

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain confidential, 
privileged or proprietary information.  If you have received it in error, 
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original and any copy or 
printout.  Unintended recipients are prohibited from making any other use of 
this e-mail.  Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no 
viruses are present in this e-mail, we accept no liability for any loss or 
damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments, or for any delay or 
errors or omissions in the contents which result from e-mail transmission.


The information contained in this message may be privileged and/or confidential 
and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. Note that any views or opinions presented in this message are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ameren. 
All e-mails are subject to monitoring and archival. Finally, the recipient 
should check this message and any attachments for the presence of viruses. 
Ameren accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by 
this e-mail. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by replying to the message and deleting the material from any 
computer. Ameren Corporation

Reply via email to