On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> "Shawn Walker" <swalker at opensolaris.org> wrote:
>
> > > > The OpenSolaris community already has such a thing. I have not yet
> > > > seen Sun prevent adding or removing anything with this mysterious veto
> > > > power that you speak of.
> > >
> > > Adding things does not yet work as expected and Sun did remove code 
> > > without
> > > asking before.
> >
> > Without any specific examples I have not yet seen proof of that.
>
> Your memory seems to be short.

I am not a mind reader Jorg. Please state explicit examples or
discontinue this thread.

> > Also, Sun engineers should be able to remove code at any time without
> > asking anyone but arc, etc.
>
> I thought OpenSolaris is trying to convert to a community driven project.

What I meant is that any body should be able to submit a change that
removes or modifies code without calling for a vote or doing anything
other than what is required right now.

That means I could submit a change tomorrow to remove certain bits of
code from ON, etc. and as long as ARC, and whoever else is supposed to
be involved is involved, then it should be fine.

This means that Sun engineers should not have to do any more than a
community member does to remove code.

With that said, even as a community-driven project, Sun has certain
legal responsibilities that may call upon it in certain cases to
remove code without "community approval" due to other requirements.

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all
junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics
are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall

Reply via email to