Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> wrote:

> > There are many things that have been promised but not yet turned into 
> > reality 
> > by Sun.
>
> We really don't need that kind of comment Joerg and I'd have hoped
> by now that you would know why these things take the time they do.

Why do believe that nobody should mention that there is a gap between what

http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/roadmap/;jsessionid=B5D4C79B682A7C7284C44EB0E3FED56B

did list before and what really happened.

> As for answering the original question it is all about time to
> do the analysis to ensure that Sun has all of the necessary legal
> rights to release the source.  This stuff has to be done carefully
> and correctly otherwise there could be legal repercussions and I'm
> sure none of us want that for OpenSolaris.  There is only a limited
> amount of resources available for this, plus remember it actually
> COSTS Sun money do to some of the legal analysis so we have to
> ensure that we do the most important things first.  Getting the
> sources to the storage consolidation and things like libm were
> obviously deemed more important that the source to TW.

The real problem is that Sun is hiding too much of the work behind the curtain
so people will see what Sun did announce and compare with what happenes.

We all know that the legal check is cost intensive but this does not help
people who compare previous Sun announces with reality.

It would help is Sun would be more open ragrding information about the
state of certain projects.

J?rg

-- 
 EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js at cs.tu-berlin.de                (uni)  
       schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de     (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

Reply via email to