On Oct 10, 2013, at 4:50 PM, durga <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oh! Thanks Murphy.  Though RCP is pretty old, I think the technique can be 
> applicable for Hybrid SDN networks . The traditonal routers can form 
> neighbour ship with controllers to exchange IP information. 

Exactly.  ON.Lab has been pursuing this with BGP peering, for example (not on 
POX).  There are other examples of interfacing with hybrid networks too (e.g., 
RouteFlow).

> Also, is there any documentation about the architecture of the POX 
> controller?? Just to know as to where the controller stores the computed 
> flows etc?? 

POX is more of a framework than a controller, so there's no universal 
architecture and no one place flows are stored (if they're stored at all).  
It's really up to individual components.  l2_learning, for example, keeps 
MAC/port table per switch in an instance attribute.

-- Murphy

> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Murphy McCauley <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> No component that comes with POX does routing in the sense of traditional IP 
> routers.  If your routes are static, it's relatively easy to build a 
> component that does this.  If you need to communicate with existing dynamic 
> routing it's a bit more complex, but still doable.  POX doesn't currently 
> come with an example of this, but probably will someday.
> 
> POX does come with examples, however, which can more or less make a bunch of 
> connected switches act like one big L2 switch.  If there are traditional 
> routers at the edge of this, that's fine...
> 
> -- Murphy
> 
> 
> On Oct 10, 2013, at 4:23 PM, durga <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hello All,
>> 
>> This is my first email to the group.
>> Was wondering if POX has routing capability. The pox.openflow.discovery 
>> module uses LLDP to perform topology discovery ,but what about the 
>> controllers which are placed in hybrid networks??? such as a part being SDN 
>> and rest being traditional networks?  or those switches which are not LLDP 
>> enabled?
>> 
>> Apologies if the question sounds too naive. 
>> 
>> Cheers!
>> Durga
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to