TEMPO
No. 01/VII/Sept 05 - 11, 2006
Economy & Business 

Two Garudas, One Squeeze 


The loans of Raja Garuda Mas and Garuda Indonesia from Bank Mandiri are 
categorized as problem loans. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ONCE in a while, there was a smile on the face of Agus Martowardojo, CEO of 
Bank Mandiri. At the moment, Agus is in a reasonably good mood because the 
problem loans of the 30 largest debtors at Bank Mandiri have been reduced 
during the last year. Several of these, which comprise some of Indonesia's top 
companies, have started to make repayment installments on debts that were 
previously classified as problem loans. These major debtors include Budi Acid 
Jaya, Sulfindo and Apac Inti Corpora. 

These repayments have reduced the problem loans to Rp14.84 trillion, as of June 
this year. While one year ago, the total of their problem loans still stood at 
Rp18.46 trillion. The proportion of these problem loans against non-performing 
loans (NPLs) has also dropped from 75 percent to 56 percent. And by the end of 
this year, according to Agus, there will be more debt repayment installments 
amounting to around Rp4 trillion. 

However, not everything is this encouraging. In addition to debtors that are 
cooperative, there are also several that are stubborn. Agus made a special 
point of mentioning the name Raja Garuda Mas. According to Agus, Bank Mandiri 
has already been negotiating the debts of this integrated paper company 
belonging to Sukanto Tanoto for a period of two years. "There is still no 
improvement in terms of attitude," said Agus, this time with an extremely 
serious look on his face. 

Raja Garuda Mas obtained this loan from a syndication of national banks in 
order to finance its Riau Complex integrated paper manufacturing plant. The 
syndicated loan totaled US$1.5 billion, or Rp13.5 trillion, and the banks 
involved were Bank Mandiri, BNI, Bank Panin, Bank Niaga and Bank Danamon. Of 
this total, Bank Mandiri's contribution amounted Rp5.4 trillion. This became a 
problem loan in 2000 and was eventually restructured. Every year, Raja Garuda 
Mas's repayments amount to US$61 million. 

What has created a lot of pressure for Agus is that there appear to have been 
no good intentions from Sukanto in terms of improving the company's debt 
repayment installments. This is in spite of Raja Garuda's revenues jumping 
dramatically since pulp prices rose from US$350 per ton in 2002 to more than 
US$600 per ton. Since 2004, the revenues earned by this business group have 
jumped to almost US$1 billion per year. However, Raja Garuda still makes annual 
debt repayments of just US$61 million. This still has to be shared with other 
syndication members. 

Based on Bank Indonesia regulations, these repayments-with an interest rate of 
only 0.5 percent per year, far below market rates-mean that the loan has been 
categorized as a problem loan. As a result, the NPL ratios of both Bank Mandiri 
and BNI have shot up. The proportions of the Riau Complex problem loan at Bank 
Mandiri and BNI are certainly high, amounting to 16 percent and 15 percent 
respectively of the total NPLs at the two government banks. 

Raja Garuda has violated several parts of its agreement. These violations, 
according to Agus, include proceeds of export-import transactions not being 
deposited at Bank Mandiri and cash excesses not being utilized to pay its 
obligations. In addition to this, if pulp prices rise, then repayment 
installments should rise too. However, this has not happened. Raja Garuda has 
also made several investments without permission from the creditors. "The 
transactions were even made through a subsidiary company in Singapore." 

For the last two years, Bank Mandiri has been requesting that Raja Garuda 
increase its debt repayments to US$120 million per year. "We have already asked 
for meetings but the owner (Sukanto) doesn't want to come," said Agus. "If this 
is really the case, are there really any good intentions? In comparison, look 
at the example of Argo Pantes. Even though the textile sector is experiencing 
difficulties, this company wants to sell off high-value properties in order to 
repay its debt." 

Agus warned that his patience as a banker has limits. In addition, times have 
changed. According to him, there has been a great deal of pressure brought to 
bear by several different parties, such as the general public and the Capital 
Market Supervisory Agency, plus Customs & Excise as well as the taxation 
authorities. "Bear in mind that in its capacity as the shareholder of Bank 
Mandiri, the government is very angry about this. We will take strict 
measures," he said. 

Unlike Bank Mandiri, Raja Garuda still feels that it is already being 
cooperative. In fact, according to Troy Pantouw, spokesperson for PT Riau 
Andalan Pulp & Paper, a subsidiary company of Raja Garuda, negotiations are 
still continuing. "We still have good intentions. The installments will 
certainly be increased however as yet there has been no decision," said Troy 
last week. 

Troy is also of the opinion that these negotiations do not require the presence 
of Sukanto Tanoto as the owner because it is sufficient for 
business-to-business negotiations to be handled by the management of Raja 
Garuda with the creditor. "I feel that any opinion insisting that Sukanto 
attend the negotiations would not be advisable." 

Although matters with Raja Garuda have not yet been settled, the management of 
Bank Mandiri faces a new threat: another debt that is worth Rp1 trillion and is 
in the form of mandatory convertible bonds (MCBs) that can be exchanged for 
shares and which are guaranteed by the government. These belong to state 
airline company Garuda Indonesia and they fall due on September 7. Because it 
has losses amounting to hundreds of billions of rupiah, Garuda is unable to pay 
and has requested that the bonds be converted to shares. 

This has infuriated the management of Bank Mandiri. Why? Because if this were 
to take place, then the bonds would be categorized as problem loans, meaning 
that Bank Mandiri, once again, would have to set aside reserves amounting to 
Rp1 trillion. This would wipe out the bank's profit, which stood at only Rp815 
billion in June of this year. And that is not all. This state bank would no 
longer enjoy the interest of 4 percent per year. 

"We don't want the bonds to be converted into shares because eventually this 
will mean losses for Bank Mandiri," said Agus. The letter of rejection was 
already sent some weeks ago. The conversion of the bonds is considered to be 
different to a debt write-off. 

Agus has acknowledged that in the debt restructuring agreement of 2001 it does 
in fact state that after Garuda has gone public (the original target was 2003), 
then the bonds can be converted into shares that can later be sold off. But the 
decision to convert the bonds is not for Garuda to make, rather it rests in the 
hands of the bank. "What is required now is the government's assurance that it 
will still guarantee the bonds and Garuda will continue to seek a strategic 
investor." 

Garuda itself remains convinced that Bank Mandiri will be prepared to convert 
the debt into shares. The conviction of the management of Garuda has been 
strengthened by signals from senior officials at the State Ministry for 
State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) who have stated that the debts of SOEs at state 
banks will be written off following the issuing of a government regulation that 
will separate state assets and SOE assets. If this were to happen, Garuda will 
be safe and Bank Mandiri will become the victim. "This would cause losses to 
investors and shareholders in Bank Mandiri," said Agus. 

Alex Maneklaran, Finance Director of Garuda, has denied requesting Bank Mandiri 
write off the debt. According to him, the conversion to shares is covered in 
the agreement signed in September 2001. "Following discussions with the 
government, we will submit an official proposal for the restructuring of the 
debt to the creditors at the beginning of this September," Alex told Tempo last 
week. 

If this goes as planned, then Garuda will be able to make use of this in order 
to negotiate debts with other creditors. In addition to Bank Mandiri, Garuda 
also has a debt to the European Export Credit Agency (ECA) amounting to US$500 
million (Rp4.5 trillion). This was used for the purchase of six Airbus 330 
planes. 

The green light to reopen negotiations could already be seen during a meeting 
this June with ECA in London. This was different to the situation earlier 
because before ECA refused to reopen negotiations with Garuda. ECA always asked 
for a government guarantee as regards any debt restructuring. However, because 
Indonesian law states that the government is not allowed to guarantee corporate 
debt, ECA wants to discuss ways of settling the debt. "We still wish to share 
the burden of the debt," said Alex. 

In order to improve the company's bargaining position in facing ECA, there have 
been reports that the Garuda Corruption Committee is currently carrying out an 
investigation into the possible marking up of the purchase price of the six 
Airbus planes. However, Alex denied that any findings would be used as weapons 
for negotiation. "The findings are not available yet. We just want to focus on 
the strategy of sharing the burden." 

Heri Susanto and Bagja Hidayat 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bank Mandiri's Major Debtors 

Kiani Kertas 
Owner: Prabowo Subianto 
Value of Debt: Rp2 trillion 
Catagory: Uncooperative 

Great River 
Owner: Sunjoto Tanudjaja 
Value of Debt: Rp300 billion 
Catagory: Uncooperative 

Raja Garuda Mas 
Owner: Sukanto Tanoto 
Value of Debt: Rp5.4 trillion 
Catagory: Not yet cooperative 

Garuda Indonesia 
Owner: State-Owned Enterprise 
Value of Debt: Rp1.3 trillion 
Catagory: Not yet cooperative 

Djajanti Group 
Owner: Burhan Uray 
Value of Debt: Rp869 billion 
Catagory: Not yet cooperative 

Suba Indah 
Owner: Benny Tjokrosaputro 
Value of Debt: Rp1 trillion 
Catagory: Not yet cooperative 

Domba Mas 
Owner: Susanto Liem 
Value of Debt: Rp1.9 trillion 
Catagory: Starting to be cooperative 

Argo Pantes 
Owner: The Nin King 
Value of Debt: Rp2 trillion 
Catagory: Cooperative 

A Latief Group 
Owner: Abdul Latief 
Value of Debt: Rp720 billion 

Batavindo 
Owner: Habil Marati 
Value of Debt: Rp 540 billion 

Source: Bank Man


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WktRrD/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 
4. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Kirim email ke