--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 11:40:45 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: KLA ATTACKS EVERYONE; MEDIA ATTACKS...MILOSEVIC? > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is being sent on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > as part of the mailing list that you joined. > List: emperorsclothes > URL: http://www.emperors-clothes.com > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > URL for this article: > http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/expan1.htm > > Join our email list at http://emperors-clothes.com/f.htm.; Receive > about one article/day. > > www.tenc.net * [Emperor's Clothes] > > Dear friends, > > Yesterday I sent out the Russian Duma's Resolution calling for > freeing Slobodan Milosevic. Some list members, who perhaps read > Emperor's Clothes articles on 9-11 but not on Yugoslavia, wrote in, > expressing surprise that we believed Mr. Milosevic innocent. > > We are therefore sending out two articles. The first was written a > year ago. The war it refers to was/is in Macedonia, for this was when > the KLA terrorists, based in Kosovo, and, as we now know, paid by the > UN-NATO apparatus there, stepped up their attacks on Macedonia and > inner Serbia. (8) & (9) > > That article is posted below. It is timely for it deals with the > creation of an imaginary person, the Media Milosevic, cause of all > suffering in the Balkans and perhaps the universe. > > The second, entitled 'Hague 'Prosecutor' Charges Milosevic Is Unfair > (to Liars),' will follow shortly. > > We'll be sending you a new piece in our 9-11 series very soon... > -- Jared Israel > > *** > > KLA ATTACKS EVERYONE; MEDIA ATTACKS...MILOSEVIC? > by Jared Israel (3-3-2001) > > The Western media is preparing us for yet another terrorist war which > NATO will be helpless to prevent although it is training the > terrorists. > > "Western special forces were still training the guerrillas, as a > result of decisions taken before the change of government in > Yugoslavia." (BBC, Jan. 29, 2001) (1) > > The 'guerrillas' in question are members of the terrorist Kosovo > Liberation Army, or KLA. > > You remember the KLA, don't you? > > They're the people NATO installed in power in Kosovo in June 1999 > after which they dutifully drove out almost all Serbs, 'Gypsies', > Jews and Slavic Muslims, or killed them. (9) > > Bill Clinton and George W. are quite fond of the KLA. Senator Joseph > Lieberman has said: > > "[The] United States of America and the Kosovo Liberation Army stand > for the same human values and principles... Fighting for the KLA is > fighting for human rights and American values." ('Washington Post' > April 28, 1999) > > The KLA, which goes under various names these days, has been > dissolved more than once, yet continues to start new terrorist wars. > > Aside from an invasion of southern Serbia, which it started a year > ago, the KLA is also attacking Macedonia. > > The KLA, or whatever they're called, has been fully disarmed but > employs heavy weapons plus there are NATO combat helicopters > providing air cover. (2) > > MASS MEDIA PREPARES US FOR WAR > > The way the mass media gets us ready for new terrorist wars is by > marinating our heads in dreck. > > Consider an article that appeared in the February 24th London > 'Telegraph'. The body of the article concerns the KLA's latest > terrorist attacks. But the headline reads: > > "NATO FORCES FACE NEW THREAT IN BALKANS" > > Huh? Is somebody threatening NATO? No, nobody is threatening NATO, > although it richly deserves it. > > The point of the title is to give readers the proper attitude prior > to breaking the news that NATO's prize pet, the KLA, is again > attacking Serbia and Macedonia. > > Readers must be directed away from unacceptable if perfectly logical > speculations such as that maybe the UN group in Kosovo, which made > the KLA the official 'Kosovo Protection Corp', and NATO, which has > been training the terrorists attacking Serbia and Macedonia, are > behind these attacks. Oh no no no, says the title, these attacks > threaten NATO, and gently nudges us away from treacherous waters. > > Now for your consideration, here is the article's first sentence: > > > "The Kosovo war was fought to defeat Slobodan Milosevic and his dream > of a 'Greater Serbia'". > Amazing. This article is supposedly about the recent terrorist > attacks. News reports are supposed to start by telling us who did it, > what happened, where it happened, when and why. > > Did Milosevic go out last night and launch terrorist attacks on the > Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia plus southern Serbia? > > By leading with this sentence, the 'Telegraph' dredges up all our > memories of anti-Serb media stories past. It gives us the impression > that whatever happens now stems from Milosevic. This is important for > two reasons. First, Milosevic could not have done bad things, e.g., > conducted a fight for a 'Greater Serbia', without mass support. Thus > this sentence is actually attacking the entire Serbian resistance to > NATO. Second, NATO and the pro-NATO leaders in Belgrade are trying to > build public support for arresting Milosevic. They want to stage a > show trial to convince the world that NATO is innocent and the Serbs > are guilty for the breakup of Yugoslavia. > > At the same time, this opening sentence tells readers that NATO is > innocent of wrongdoing. If it had not bombed Yugoslavia and occupied > Kosovo it would have failed to: > > "defeat Slobodan Milosevic and his dream of a 'Greater Serbia'" > > Thus, like the headline, the first sentence puts us in the proper > mental state for a constructive news experience: pro-NATO and on the > lookout for Serbian dreams of expansion. > > But wait a minute. Is the 'Telegraph' seriously saying NATO bombed > Yugoslavia to stop a Milosevic dream? > > Or did this dream take some earthly form? Was Milosevic trying to > expand Serbia into Kosovo? > > That must be the idea, but here we encounter a wee glitch. At the > time NATO attacked, Kosovo was a province of Serbia. In fact Kosovo > has been an internationally recognized province of Serbia since > before World War I. The border between Kosovo (that is, Serbia) and > the country now known as Albania is one of the oldest borders in > Europe. Moreover, Kosovo is where Serbia started. Saying Serbia is > expanding into Kosovo is similar to saying New York City is expanding > into Manhattan. > > This 'Greater Serbia' stuff was invented by the Austro-Hungarian > Empire as war propaganda to justify its attack on little Serbia, an > attack that became World War I. > > You remember World War I. > > The 'Greater Serbia' stuff was black humor back then - this elephant > whining that it was threatened by the expansionism of a mouse. > > And the 'Serbian expansionism' claim has not gained intellectual > stature with time - but so what? It is not brains but money and might > that count in the new American World Order; lucky thing. > > The "Greater Serbia" nonsense was reissued in the early 1990s. Since > then it has been foisted on us continuously by Western journalists, > politicians and professors. It is the stock explanation for every > conflict in Yugoslavia. > > But despite all of Milosevic's expansionist dreaming, Serbia has > never annexed any land. Not an acre. On the other hand, over a > million Serbs and other Yugoslav loyalists have been driven from > their lands and/or homes in other parts of Yugoslavia (e.g., the > farmers who owned most of Bosnia's land because they farmed it). > These refugees, mostly ethnic Serbs but also including many thousands > of 'Gypsies,' ethnic Albanians, Bosnian Muslims and Croats, now live > in Serbia. > > "TO DEFEND THE UNION" > > Yugoslavia, led by Serbia, fought defensively throughout the 1990s, > resisting secessionists who launched armed attacks on Yugoslav forces > and who depopulated vast areas of their Serbian inhabitants and other > undesirables. > > The two most extreme examples are the Krajina section of Yugoslavia, > near Croatia (over 250,00 Serbs driven out by Croatian fascist troops > under U.S. control in August 1995. If you add to this the Serbs, > 'Gypsies' and others drive from Croatia itself, the total is probably > over 500,00) and Kosovo (about 350,000 Serbs and others driven out > following the NATO takeover in June 1999). > > The goal of the secessionist attacks was to rip off parts of > Yugoslavia and form mini-states under US and German domination. Serbs > were the main target because they are the cement of Yugoslavia. The > German Establishment has been fully aware of this fact for 100 years > which is why Germany launched two world wars with attacks on the > Serbs. > > Thus throughout the 1990s Yugoslavia, led by Serbia, has in effect > resisted Anglo-U.S. and German "dreams of expansion." > > Serbia was in a position similar to that of the northern states > during the U.S. Civil War. (7) The North fought to prevent the > southern states from forming a slave nation under British domination > and Serbia fought to prevent parts of Yugoslavia from forming > racially 'pure' statelets under Western domination. > > Western politicians and the mass media have accused Serbia of > destabilizing the Balkans. What breathtaking cynicism. As anyone who > has read European history knows, the existence of a state unifying > the south Slavs ('Yugoslavia') is crucial to the stability of the > Balkans and Russia and a factor for peace in Europe. Serbia's > opposition to the splintering of Yugoslavia into weak Anglo-American > and German neocolonies has nothing to do with "dreaming of a 'Greater > Serbia'". > > THE MEDIA Milosevic > > To make the 'Greater Serbia' charge believable it has been linked to > the accusation that Mr. Milosevic was and is motivated by hatred of > non-Serbs. > > The Western media has come up with a new, improved Milosevic to aid > in digesting this idea. I encountered this Media Milosevic while > watching a Fox News program during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. > Fox was interviewing a 'NY Times' reporter, an 'expert' on > Yugoslavia. The reporter said: > > "The ethnic cleansing of Kosovo, *as Milosevich would call it,* is a > success." > > So brief but so untrue. > > If the reporter said, "Milosevic has popularized the term 'ethnic > cleansing' and used it in Kosovo," it would have been a lie, but a > straightforward lie. One could have asked: "Where's the proof?" > > But the reporter presented his accusation as if he were mentioning a > fact so well known it required no proof. Such casualness has great > power for it makes the uninformed viewer (virtually all Americans) > think: "So, Milosevic invented the idea of ethnic cleansing. One more > reason to get that man behind bars." > > The 'New York Times' has been replete with references to Milosevic as > the author of 'ethnic cleansing.' For instance, on August 3, 1992, > Anthony Lewis, the prolific Serb-baiter, wrote, in a 'Times' column > syndicated in several other newspapers: > > "President Bush compared Saddam Hussein to Hitler. I am against such > analogies, because they cheapen the Holocaust. But if that one is to > be used, it better fits the Serbian leader, Slobodan Milosevic, the > inventor of 'ethnic cleansing.'" (Anthony Lewis, 'N.Y. Times,' August > 3, 1992) > > Emperor's Clothes uses a research tool called Lexis. With it we can > scan the world press going back 20 years in a few seconds. If a > statement has been published in the media, we'll find it. > > I did an exhaustive search of 'N.Y. Times' articles. The 'N.Y. Times' > has never quoted Milosevic saying one word in favor of 'ethnic > cleansing'. Never. > > How could Milosevic call for 'ethnic cleansing' without using the > words? > > The reporter interviewed by Fox (and Mr. Lewis, and a host of others) > was simply lying - or to be more accurate, he was not only lying, he > was presenting his lie in a manner calculated to make the viewer feel > that everyone but himself or herself of course knew it was true. > > The term 'ethnic cleansing' has an interesting history. It was first > used in Kosovo in the early 1980s. Albanian secessionists were waging > a terrorist campaign, driving tens of thousands of Serbs from Kosovo. > (4) The 'N.Y. Times' covered this nightmare in a news story in 1982. > The 'Times' reporter interviewed a Yugoslav official in Kosovo, a man > of Albanian ancestry, who said: > > "'The [Albanian] nationalists have a two-point platform...first to > establish what they call an ethnically clean Albanian republic and > then the merger with Albania to form a greater Albania." ("N.Y. > Times', July 12, 1982) > > For a bit more on the history of the use of 'ethnic cleansing' to > smear the victims of 'ethnic cleansing' see footnote (6) at the end. > > EVERYBODY'S DOING IT > > The accusations against Mr. Milosevic (i.e., against Bad Serbs) have > come from all sides. Liberal and even leftist writers have taken part > in - and even led - these attacks. For example, there is the Spanish > author, Juan Goytisolo, who views himself an icon of > broad-mindedness. During the bombing of Yugoslavia, Mr. Goytisolo > wrote a piece for the London 'Independent' attacking a phenomenon > which in his title he broadmindedly called "THE VIRUS THAT HAS > INVADED THE LEFT." (His emphasis) This virus consisted of writers who > opposed NATO's bombing of the Serbs. > > Establishing his credentials in the first line, Mr. Goytisolo assures > us that: "NO ONE detests aerial bombardments more than I do". (His > emphasis.) This is encouraging, and once said, Mr. Goytisolo gets > down to business, which is to explain why he does not detest the > aerial bombing of Serbia: > > "Since 1992, it has been apparent to anyone familiar with the Serbian > ultra-nationalist ideology embraced by Milosevic that the Kosovo > ethnocide was inevitable...Full of hatred and scorn for the Bosnian > Muslim and the Kosovar Albanian, [Milosevich's views] did not differ > greatly from the anti-Semitic diatribes of the Nazis." (4-21-1999, > London 'Independent') > > Please note that Mr. Goytisolo does not provide evidence for his > charge that anti-Albanian ethnocide has taken place in Kosovo. Rather > he acts as if the existence of this supposed ethnocide is an > established fact and concerns himself only with the question why it > has happened. The answer, he says, is Mr. Milosevic and his supposed > ideology of hate. > > The problem is, at the time Mr. Goytisolo wrote these words many > people said the ethnocide charge was a lie. And clearly, were the > ethnocide charge a lie, the hunt for Serbian motivations for carrying > it out would carry less weight. > > Since NATO took over Kosovo in June, 1999, it has employed an army of > forensic experts in Kosovo. These folks have dug up half the > province, accompanied by frequent press conferences in which various > NATO and War Crimes Tribunal types promised to find mass graves with > tens of thousands of victims of Serbian brutality. In fact, they have > produced none - no mass graves, no Serbian atrocities. Digging up > individual graves all over Kosovo, they found fewer than 3000 bodies. > NATO has said 2000 people died before the bombing of Yugoslavia, that > is, before the supposed 'ethnocide' took place. That leaves 1000. We > know that hundreds of people died in NATO bombing and hundreds more > in fighting on the ground between the KLA and Yugoslav troops. > > After the most exhaustive hunt in history, NATO has produced exactly > no evidence that Serbian troops massacred ethnic Albanians. > > The accusation of ethnocide was a fabrication. (5) > > Why were Goytisolo and others able to get away with writing articles > that assumed the truth of this lie? Because the mass media barraged > us with sound bites, voiceovers, gruesome film footage, interviews > with 'victims.' Constantly repeated, these established the ethnocide > lie as an emotional truth; then people like Goytisolo could embellish > without fear of repercussions. The Serbs were fair game. > > Mr. Goytisolo says he knew the (nonexistent) ethnocide would happen > because he was familiar with Milosevic's "ultra-nationalist ideology" > involving "hatred and scorn for the Bosnian Muslim and the Kosovar > Albanian" not unlike the "anti-Semitic diatribes of the Nazis." > > Was this ideology, like the nonexistent drive for 'Greater Serbia', > also limited to Mr. Milosevic's dreams? Or was Milosevic's ideology > written down somewhere? > > If it was not written down, then how did Goytisolo become familiar > with it? > > If it was written down, where? In a book? In the text of a speech? Is > Slobodan Milosevic at least quoted in one single news report actually > saying hateful things about Muslims and ethnic Albanian 'Kosovars'? > > Goytisolo is silent. That is really too bad because in all the > interviews and speeches I have read Mr. Milosevic attacks Nazi-type > ideologies and calls for national brotherhood. > > Could it be that Mr. Goytisolo is reading stuff written by that Media > Milosevic mentioned above? The one who doesn't exist? > > To be fair, in the 'Independent' article Mr. Goytisolo does offer > some monstrous quotes to support his charge. The first is from > Generalissimo Francisco Franco, the Fascist dictator of Spain. > Another is from Adolph Hitler. Then we get more Franco, and > finally...another from Hitler. And then Mr. Goytisolo lays down his > trump card: Milosevic, he declares, is just like them! > > Alas, it doesn't sit right. If only Goytisolo could provide some > word, some deed, some sort of indication of "hatred and scorn" for > the Muslim or the 'Kosovar'. > > Goytisolo provides: nothing. Could it be he was really thinking about > Franco and Hitler all that time, and it just came out 'Milosevic'? > > THE INFAMOUS SPEECH > > For years we have been told Milosevic launched the drive for 'Greater > Serbia'" at a speech he gave in Kosovo in 1989. > > The only thing that nobody who attacks the speech ever does is quote > it. We have posted the speech on Emperor's Clothes. (3) Below are two > excerpts. > > First, here is what Milosevic said about non-Serbian citizens of > Serbia, including of course ethnic Albanians and Muslims of varying > ethnicity: > > "Serbia has never had only Serbs living in it. Today, more than in > the past, members of other peoples and nationalities also live in it. > This is not a disadvantage for Serbia. I am truly convinced that it > is its advantage...Socialism in particular, being a progressive and > just democratic society, should not allow people to be divided in the > national and religious respect. The only differences one can and > should allow in socialism are between hard working people and idlers > and between honest people and dishonest people. Therefore, all people > in Serbia who live from their own work, honestly, respecting other > people and other nations, are in their own republic." > > It has been estimated that the audience for Milosevic's 1989 speech > was as high as one million people. If Milosevic was going to whip the > throngs into a frenzy over his ''dream of a 'Greater Serbia''', this > was the time to do it. > > "For as long as multinational communities have existed, their weak > point has always been the relations between different nations. The > threat is that the question of one nation being endangered by the > others can be posed one day -- and this can then start a wave of > suspicions, accusations, and intolerance, a wave that invariably > grows and is difficult to stop. This threat has been hanging like a > sword over our heads all the time. * Internal and external enemies of > multi-national communities are aware of this and therefore they > organize their activity against multinational societies mostly by > fomenting national conflicts.* At this moment, we in Yugoslavia are > behaving as if we have never had such an experience and as if in our > recent and distant past we have never experienced the worst tragedy > of national conflicts that a society can experience and still > survive." > > Smear campaigns are often successful because most people are > reasonably honest and make the understandable if mistaken assumption > that everyone is like them. Thus when a well-known and supposedly > broad-minded writer (like Goytisolo) says Milosevich has an ideology > similar to the Nazis, people are inclined to think, "Where there's > smoke, there's fire," i.e., there must be some truth to the charge. > But the truth is it is a bare-faced lie. > > MEANWHILE, BACK IN SOUTHERN SERBIA > > France, one of the lesser "external enemies of multi-national > communities," has squealed on two of the greater enemies, the U.S. > and Britain, informing newsmen that: > > "NATO countries were discussing whether to send troops into a tense > southern Serbia buffer zone, but the alliance flatly denied such a > move was being considered. > > "'The question of whether it is necessary to deploy an international > military force in this region is now being discussed among the > allies,' French Ministry spokesman Bernard Valero said... > > "French diplomatic sources said discussion of a force was prompted by > concern over the safety of EU [European Union] monitors." > ('Reuters', 3-1-2001) > > You remember Southern Serbia, don't you? That's one of the places > which the KLA, under one of its names, is invading. It is the > violence resulting from this KLA invasion which, if the French happen > to be telling the truth, is to serve as NATO's excuse to invade > southern Serbia as well. > > Do you remember the KLA? That's that terrorist group which the BBC > said "Western special forces were still training." But don't worry, > it's OK for the West to be training these terrorists because Senator > Lieberman says they're fighting for ''American values'' and anyway > it's being done "as a result of decisions taken before the change of > government in Yugoslavia", in other words, while Milosevic was still > running things and I'm sure you remember Milosevic. > > Don't you? > > Come on how many times do I have to explain he's the guy who hates > everyone and is always dreaming about attacking other people's > countries remember? No no not Bill Clinton. Not Tony Blair for Pete's > sake. Not Junior Bush --- Milosevic. He's behind that violence in > southern Serbia which is threatening our boys. We need to send more > troops in there and kick some serious butt and then put that guy > somewhere he can't do any more harm against our Way of Life and - and > - and - and... > > So many lies. So little time. > > -- Jared Israel 3-2-2001 > > Further reading > > 1) The BBC tells all. Anyway, it tells a lot. See: 'Diplomats Admit > NATO Backs KLA Invasion of Inner Serbia' at > http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/admi.htm.; > > 2) On NATO helicopters providing air cover for the KLA invasion of > southern Serbia, see 'Pentagon Dogs'; at > http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/tika/dogs.htm > > 3) Milosevic's 1989 Kosovo speech can be read at > http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/milosaid.html > > 4) In the interview "Kosovo: Nightmare with the Best Intentions" two > Serbian-Americans tell what it was like in Kosovo during the 1970s > and 1980s. Most informative. > http://www.emperors-clothes.com/interviews/tika.htm > > 5) The following are useful articles on the myth of Albanian genocide > in Kosovo: > > * Gen. Mac Kenzie commanded the UN forces in Bosnia. He examines the > Kosovo mass graves baloney in 'Where have all the bodies gone?' by > General (retired) Lewis MacKenzie at > http://emperors-clothes.com/news/mack.htm > > * This is the report of the press conference held by Spanish Forensic > experts who walked off the job in Kosovo and criticized NATO. > 'Spanish experts see no Serbian genocide in Kosovo' > by Pablo Ordaz http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/spanish.htm > > * On the significance of the Spanish forensic experts: 'Spanish > Forensic Experts' Report - A Commentary' by Jared Israel at > http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/sp-comment.htm > > CLICK TO RETURN TO WHERE YOU WERE READING > > 6) Much could be written about the macabre history of 'ethnic > cleansing'. The term derives from the racism of those ethnic Albanian > secessionists, schooled by Hitler during World War II, who looked > (and still look) upon Serbs, 'Gypsies' and Jews as filth - hence the > desire to create that curiously phrased entity, the "ethnically clean > Albanian republic." (N.Y. Times, July 12, 1982; to read this article > in full, go to > http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/benworks/1980news.html#BM9) > > The term was picked up by psychological warfare experts advising > neo-Fascist Croatian secessionists in 1991-1992. In a truly Orwellian > touch, spokesmen for the Fascist Croatians claimed 'ethnic cleansing' > was the program of the very Serbs they were at that time driving from > ancestral lands in and near Croatia. > > But the term was little known in the West until Bush, Sr. used it in > a press conference, August 6, 1992. There he declared a major > escalation in the U.S. anti-Serbian policy, supposedly in reaction to > a TV program which had been shown some 20 minutes before the > Conference. The TV program broadcast what were supposed to be > pictures of a (nonexistent) Serb death camp. > > (Emperor's Clothes has produced JUDGMENT, a movie which proves that > these infamous pictures of what appeared to be emaciated victims of a > death camp were actually doctored from staged footage of a > humanitarian refugee center. If you have not seen this movie and you > want to know the truth, I urge you to buy a copy. If the standard > price of $20 plus shipping is too much please tell us. You may pay > whatever you can afford. See > http://emperors-clothes.com/Film/judge.htm ) > > At the August 6th, 1992, Press Conference President Bush declared: > > "The [Serb] aggressors and extremists pursue a policy - a vile policy > - of ethnic cleansing". > > Thus President Bush planted in the public mind the notion that Serb > leaders had invented a concept which was actually rooted in 'a vile > policy' of eliminating the Serbs, the 'black people of the Balkans.' > During the following year, this blaming-the-victim refrain was > promoted in literally thousands of newspaper articles and television > programs until it became nearly impossible for ordinary people to > recall when they first 'learned' that ethnic cleansing was a concept > enthusiastically endorsed by the Serbs, its primary victims. - CLICK > TO RETURN TO ARTICLE > > 7) See 'Abe Lincoln and Slobodan Milosevic' by economist Jude > Wanniski http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/abe.htm > > 8) For Emperor's Clothes articles on Macedonia go to > http://emperors-clothes.com/mac/listm.htm > > 9) Regarding the charge that the UN and NATO have been and are still > sponsoring a terrorist war against Macedonia, see "SORRY VIRGINIA BUT > THEY ARE NATO TROOPS, NOT 'REBELS'", by Jared Israel at > http://emperors-clothes.com/mac/times.htm > > 10) 'Driven from Kosovo, Jewish leader charges NATO complicity,' > at http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/ceda.htm > > Send this article to a friend! {Does not work with all email > programs...} > > Emperor's Clothes Relies on Your Help... > > Emperor's Clothes does not charge a subscription fee. But of course > nothing is free. > > We rely mainly on volunteer labor. Nevertheless there are plenty of > bills. For example, the cost of Lexis, our search engine, has > doubled. Lexis is the best method of rapidly locating news stories > from several thousand sources over the past twenty years. It is one > of the best media research tools. But now it costs twice as much. > > We rely on our readers for contributions. If you like what we're > doing, please help if possible. (If you can't afford to make a > donation, please read our articles anyway!) > > You can mail a check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton, > MA 02461-0321. (USA) > > Or if make a contribution online via secure server at > http://emperors-clothes.com/howyour.html#donate > > Or you can call us at l 617 916-1705 between 9:30 AM and 5:30 PM, > Eastern Time (USA) and Bob will take your credit card information > over the phone. > > Or you can make a donation using at > https:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&no_shipping=1 > > Thanks for reading Emperor's Clothes! > > www.tenc.net > [Emperor's Clothes] > > > > > > Click to be removed: > http://MessageBot.com/r.cgi?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&list=emperorsclothes > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Powered by http://MessageBot.com/ > Get Cool Images at http://www.flamingtext.com/mb.html >
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com
