> > Sigh. > > I'm sorry that we failed to make things clear and consistent. > > I agree with Bill that implementations should follow the order of rules > in Section 7 of RFC 8264. > > Let me think about how we can clarify things. That might involve filing > an erratum against RFC 8265. > > Peter
Ok, thanks for clarifying it (again). My implementation will keep on following the rules in 8264 then. — Christian _______________________________________________ precis mailing list precis@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
