|
I
don't think so... In my opinion this is only a very wild guess and does not really show any underlying scientific thoughts... Any amateur could come up with silly "conjectures" like this. For example: 2^(2^0)+1 = 2^1+1 = 3 (Fermat prime) 2^(2^3)+1 = 2^8+1 = 257 (Fermat prime) So, 2^(2^257)+1 is probably a new Fermat prime !!! If you would be so kind to study the history of prime numbers for a couple of days or so, you would probably see that prime numbers won't let themselves be caught in such a simple formula like that. Please be a bit more modest next time and show the prime numbers the respect they deserve... Dr. med. Roland Linder wrote:
|
_______________________________________________ Prime mailing list [email protected] http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
